CC_Minutes_2013_0708 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,July 8, 2013 Page 10 which may require further refinement of the ordinance language to be consistent with actual application. McGehee moved, Laliberte seconded, enactment of Ordinance No. 1448 (At- tachment C) entitled, "An Ordinance Amending Selected Text of Title 10, Zoning Ordinance of the Roseville City Code;" amending the text in the Materials Section in Section 1005-02F (Commercial and Mixed-Use Districts Design Standards); Section 1006.02C (Employment Districts Design Standards); Section 1007.02F (Institutional District Design Standards); and Section 1008.02C (Park and Recrea- tion District Design Standards). Roll Call Ayes: Willmus; Laliberte; Etten; McGehee; and Roe. Nays: None. e. Request by the Planning Division for Consideration of Zoning Text Changes to Multiple Sections to Review How Outdoor Storage is Defined and Regu- lated and Where Outdoor Storage is Allowed Associate Planner Bryan Lloyd provided a brief summary of this requested modi- fication as detailed in the RCA dated July 8, 2013. Councilmember Etten thanked staff for bringing this proposal forward, opining that it made sense to break it out. Councilmember Etten noted that he had spoken to staff earlier today with some minor corrections; with staff identifying the ma- jority of those revisions in their displayed copy of the ordinance in place of the draft provided in the RCA. Discussion included outdoor storage versus storage in an enclosed building and what could be precluded or if a property could be used exclusively for outdoor storage if they met other regulations and defined under definitions (fleet); punctu- ation and sentence structure correction to line 18 of the draft ordinance (Attach- ment B); types of fleet vehicles; distinction between operable vehicles versus out- of-service vehicles (e.g. snow plow trucks and other seasonable equipment) pre- ferred in a screened area; the subjective interpretation of limited timing for out-of- service or inoperable vehicles; inclusion of building materials under equip- ment/goods category; need for a clear distinction between finished goods versus raw materials; need for defining "permanent" and "temporary" outdoor storage (line 26); and clarifying permitted versus unpermitted uses requiring an Interim Use Permit or Conditional Use application approval, with aesthetic impacts and/or erosion control materials addressed in the updated Zoning Code for Industrial Districts. Additional discussion included definition of"acceptable small amount of material (page 3, line 52) and addressed in Section 5, 1009.02.D.30 with staff anticipating a level at approximately 10% as being appropriate, but needing further review and