My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0708
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0708
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2013 12:33:27 PM
Creation date
7/22/2013 1:37:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/8/2013
Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 8, 2013 <br /> Page 17 <br /> er internal candidates would be fed into the larger process or considered separate- <br /> ly. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that she had the impression from that previous <br /> meeting that the majority said to have all candidates—whether external or internal <br /> — apply through the process; with the majority consensus creating this current <br /> path. Regarding internal candidates, Councilmember McGehee opined that her <br /> only concern was if an internal candidate could provide the efficiencies and elim- <br /> inate duplication of services being sought by the City Council; or whether they <br /> would be inclined to continue the style created over the last 5-6 years, based on <br /> the relationships and/or territory developed among co-workers during that time. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that the previous style had not boded well for <br /> the City or its budget during that time; and that change was difficult in itself, but <br /> could prove more so for an internal candidate in seeking to address known issues <br /> of their colleagues. Councilmember McGehee opined that she would support <br /> opening up the process for internal candidates to apply, with the interview process <br /> then addressing some of her concerns. <br /> Councilmember Etten opined that he preferred not to limit the process at this <br /> time; and agreed that there were excellent candidates internally. However, with- <br /> out a profile directing what the City Council was seeking this round, and its ex- <br /> pectations of a new position and person, it would be difficult to avoid burying it- <br /> self in the status quo. Councilmember Etten spoke in support of opening the pro- <br /> cess while still recognizing internal candidates at some point in the process. <br /> However, Councilmember Etten opined that the process needed to have follow- <br /> through to lead the City into the future. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that having that profile would help internal and external candi- <br /> dates know what the City Council was seeking; and further opined that as long as <br /> the process remained fair and open, they reserved the right to change directions at <br /> any time during that process. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte advised that she had performed research on both firms <br /> with other communities they'd assisted, and noted that one of those cities had ac- <br /> tually gone with an internal candidate in the end. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that the consensus appeared that the City Council wanted to <br /> continue looking at the broader search. <br /> Regarding a facilitated discussion to develop basics for a profile, whether a search <br /> firm or third party, Mayor Roe suggested that such a discussion would provide <br /> other aspects to determine if the City Council wanted to use either firm or do <br /> more in-house. Mayor Roe opined that there may be some risk in one of those <br /> firms getting too busy to contract with Roseville or changing their quote signifi- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.