CC_Minutes_2013_0708 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,July 8, 2013 Page 8 Roll Call Ayes: Willmus; Laliberte; Etten; McGehee; and Roe. Nays: None. Willmus moved, Etten seconded, enactment of Ordinance Summary No. 1446 (Attachment C) entitled, "An Ordinance Amending Section 1002.10, Definitions; Table 1005-1 and 1006-1 of Title 10, Zoning Ordinance of the Roseville City Code." Roll Call (Super Majority) Ayes: Willmus; Laliberte; Etten; McGehee; and Roe. Nays: None. c. Adopt an Ordinance Creating Standards for Accessory Buildings in the Commercial and Mixed-Use and Employment Districts City Planner Paschke provided a brief summary of this requested modification as detailed in the RCA dated July 8, 2013. Discussion among Councilmembers and staff included type of storage intended as equipment, but not precluding chemical storage due to other restrictions in code regarding storage of hazardous materials; Councilmember McGehee spoke in opposition to this request, opining that most businesses had outside services that provided their lawn care. At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Mr. Paschke advised that staff had received three (3) requests for such accessory buildings to-date, all denied at the administrative level due to no current allowance in City Code for such a use. Mr. Paschke noted that any application under this proposed revision would need to meet the design stand- ards of code; and the 500 square footage would be comparable to a 1.5 — 2 stall garage. Willmus moved, Etten seconded, enactment of Ordinance No. 1447 (Attachment A) entitled, "An Ordinance Amending Selected Text of Title 10, Zoning Ordi- nance of the Roseville City Code;" amending the requirements for Accessory Us- es, Buildings, and Structures located in Tables 1005-1 and 1006-1, and articulat- ing the requirements for accessory buildings in Section 1011.12.E "7" and F "6" of the Property Performance Standards. Councilmember Willmus spoke in support of the motion; opining that this would provide an opportunity for those preferring to store snow removal and/or lawn care equipment on site versus hauling it from one site to another; and would also ensure it was stored inside and out of the view of the public. Councilmember McGehee reiterated her opposition to the motion; opining that while it was fine to have things out of the public view, it still represented equip- ment the owner was unable to fit in their original space. Councilmember McGe-