My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-06-25_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
2013-06-25_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2013 10:42:05 AM
Creation date
7/24/2013 10:41:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/25/2013
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
in support of piggybacking on any planned Ramsey Construction on County Road <br /> C west of Cleveland Avenue and west to connect eventually to the NE Diagonal. <br /> At that point, Member DeBenedet suggested further needs could then be <br /> addressed. <br /> Member DeBenedet opined that his priority was to finish out the smaller <br /> segments, especially those areas without any off-road facilities. <br /> Chair Vanderwall advised that he had a different perspective. Based on <br /> comparisons for County Road C and Lexington Avenue, Chair Vanderwall opined <br /> that those were both big, high-volume roads and couldn't be compared to <br /> Hamline Avenue with much less happening. Chair Vanderwall opined that he <br /> would install something on the other side of Lexington Avenue before Hamline <br /> Avenue. While understanding the logic of completing the routes from a mapping <br /> perspective, Chair Vanderwall opined that there was more of a need to address the <br /> higher density areas first; and realistically consider the volume of people <br /> benefitting. <br /> Members Felice and Gjerdingen concurred with Chair Vanderwall. <br /> Mr. Schwartz opined that that approach also made more sense in major arteries; <br /> noting current challenges on Lexington Avenue south of County Road B without <br /> a safe intersection for crossing other than mid-block crosswalks, which Ramsey <br /> County continues to turn down. Given the number of arterial roadways coming <br /> into and crossing Lexington Avenue (Burke, Shryer, etc.), Mr. Schwartz opined <br /> that it made sense to get east side connections for those neighborhoods. <br /> Ms. Bloom advised that residents on Parker and Shryer Avenues having safety <br /> issues in accessing the park were thrilled with plans for Victoria Avenue; and also <br /> wanted something on Lexington from County Road B to Roselawn Avenue. <br /> Further discussion included Lexington Avenue from County Road C to County <br /> Road D consisting of mainly Ramsey County Open Space; stoplights at Woodhill <br /> but not at County Road C-2, the need to re-evaluate a good crossing on County <br /> Road C-2 with traffic changes in opening up that street; and criteria used for <br /> scoring. <br /> Ms. Bloom advised that, in the Pathway Master Plan, criteria weighting was <br /> detailed on pages 24-25; and suggested a more extensive review by the PWETC <br /> before their next meeting to be aware of the rationale for that ranking, since <br /> everyone had actually walked the areas. <br /> Member Felice noted that the bus stop at Lexington and Larpenteur Avenues <br /> currently required crossing from one side to another. <br /> Page 8 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.