My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-08-06_PR_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2013
>
2013-08-06_PR_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2013 11:05:34 AM
Creation date
8/7/2013 11:05:14 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, June 10, 2013 <br />Page 13 <br />ea of the City operations. Councilmember Laliberte stated that the ability to com- <br />bine and share functions across all departments provided a more favorable option <br />in her opinion. Councilmember Laliberte noted that this fell into other reorgani- <br />zation efforts (e.g. communications) to free employees for other roles and find ef- <br />ficiencies within the organization rather than funding an additional position in the <br />overall effort to make things happen. <br />Councilmember McGehee concurred that a volunteer coordinator was needed; <br />however, she also questioned if the position was specific to the needs of the Parks <br />& Recreation Department. In discussions related to community outreach and civ- <br />ic engagement, Councilmember McGehee expressed interest in having a volunteer <br />coordinator manage the volunteer resources for the City, encouraging the com- <br />munity to volunteer in a variety of ways. <br />Commission Holt advised that, in their research, the models used all started with a <br />Parks & Recreation-focused group, and then expanded further. Commissioner <br />Holt advised that the Parks & Recreation Commission had projects already de- <br />fined and outlined, and would be the obvious place to start. <br />Councilmember McGehee concurred with the comments and proposals outlined <br />by Councilmember Laliberte for city-wide volunteer coordination. <br />At the request of Councilmember Willmus, Parks & Recreation Director Brokke <br />provided a comparison of FTE’s in the Parks & Recreation Department now, at <br />approximately 24.5 compared with several years ago at 27.5 and a total of 29 FTE <br />within the last twenty (20) years, with that reduction occurring while increasing <br />facilities and programs. <br />In researching with the Ramsey County Library Volunteer Coordinator, Commis- <br />sioner Diedrick noted their suggestion that one group be started initially to pro- <br />vide a good, sound footing, such as with a pilot program first. <br />Commissioner Gelbach noted that the Commission did not disagree that everyone <br />needed a volunteer coordinator, he noted that the Parks & Recreation Department <br />had approximately 2,700 volunteers today, and anticipated growth; and further <br />noted that this area was already in place with systems and a process to begin the <br />most effectively. Commissioner Gelbach opined that it provided a starting point, <br />and could be expanded if and when other departments indicated a need, if could <br />be expanded without waiting another year to hash out other needs. <br />Councilmember Willmus noted his viewing of the presentation at last weeks’ <br />Commission meeting; and opined that if it was going to be implemented, it would <br />be prudent to start in parks, given the thousands of people annually utilized by the <br />Department throughout the community. Councilmember Willmus further opined <br />that by having an extra person helping in that area it would save money for the <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.