Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, June 10, 2013 <br />Page 16 <br />Even thought the City will probably not have resources to assist private property <br />owners with infestation, Councilmember Laliberte noted that the infestation <br />would travel across property lines, and the City needed to educate private proper- <br />ty owners and make them aware of the issues. <br />Recess <br />Mayor Roe recessed the meeting at approximately 8:03 p.m. and reconvened at approximately <br />8:10 p.m. <br />11.Public Hearings <br />12.Budget Items <br />a.Consider Revising the 2014 Budget Process <br />At the request of Mayor Roe, Interim City Manager Trudgeon provided a brief <br />summary of the RCA dated June 10, 2013; and deferred to Finance Director Chris <br />Miller for more detail on a proposed revised 2014 budget process. Mr. Trudgeon <br />advised that Department Heads had reviewed the current timeline and potential <br />revisions, and were in agreement the RCA prepared by Finance Director Miller; <br />clarifying at the request of Councilmember Laliberte that they agreed with the re- <br />visions and were not being pulled along unwillingly. <br />Finance Director reviewed the RCA, noting that it encapsulated comments heard <br />by staff over the last few weeks, as well as their individual discussions with staff, <br />indicating that there would be more of a comfort level if everyone paused and <br />stepped back. Mr. Miller advised that a recurring theme of those concerns was <br />preference for an annual versus biennial budget process, recently implemented; as <br />well as meeting with each department for more detailed review and input versus <br />emphasizing the prioritization process alone. Another concern was with the in- <br />formation packets provided and whether or not they were helpful or feel short of <br />the information needed. Mr. Miller noted that staff didn’t want to prepare infor- <br />mation that the City Council did not want; and asked that they reach consensus on <br />the information they needed and how they wanted it presented. Mr. Miller reiter- <br />ated the comments of Interim City Manager Trudgeon with Department Heads be- <br />ing comfortable with a new approach if and when so directed by the City Council. <br />At the request of Mayor Roe, Mr. Miller advised that Department Heads univer- <br />sally liked the ability to meet with the City Council to discuss budget challenges <br />and impacts, similar to the opportunity provided during the Strategic Plan process. <br />Regarding Mayor Roe’s question regarding whether there was Department Head <br />support for the City Council’s program-based budget approach, Interim City <br />Manager Trudgeon advised that there was no universal answer for that. Given the <br />complexities of program-based budgeting and ranking, when having to eliminate <br />or reduce programs, Mr. Trudgeon stated that Department Heads often felt it was <br />hard for the City Council to relate to the negative and positive operational impacts <br />within and across departments. Using a simplistic approach broken down by de- <br /> <br />