My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0722
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0722
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2013 9:45:49 AM
Creation date
8/21/2013 9:45:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/22/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 22,2013 <br /> Page 23 <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that she was not supportive of most of the addi- <br /> tional positions requested by staff, other than the $75,000 for IT support defined <br /> in the CIP, but not for the Skating Center or other areas. Councilmember McGe- <br /> hee questioned if the Parks &Recreation Department would consider taking funds <br /> from the Parks Renewal Program in the amount of$200,000 and apply it to the <br /> skating center, keeping the CIP on track; and going forward with the CIP setting <br /> aside funds for a new club house for the golf course. <br /> Specific to the use of LGA, Mayor Roe asked for individual Councilmember <br /> comment. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated that she could support the use of LGA for oper- <br /> ating costs in 2014, depending on what was proposed to be funded. <br /> Mayor Roe spoke in support of applying LGA funds to CIP costs and not operat- <br /> ing costs. <br /> Councilmember Etten spoke in support of using LGA as a CIP investment, opin- <br /> ing that it was a good way to use the revenue in this timeframe. Councilmember <br /> Etten noted fixed costs for 2014, not including general inflation; and fixed con- <br /> tractual costs were already at$245,000. <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, Councilmember Etten identified those items he was <br /> referencing, as excerpted from page 3 of the RCA: <br /> Budget Impact Item/Description 2014 Amount <br /> Employee wage step increases for eligible employees $100,000 <br /> Employer PERA mandates, with increased contributions for 30,000 <br /> Police and Fire employees <br /> Employer healthcare increases, based on a 3% healthcare con- 50,000 <br /> tribution increase <br /> Police Patrol, additional contractual Ramsey County dispatch 65,000 <br /> costs $65,000 <br /> Councilmember Etten opined that without the maximum levy the City could bare- <br /> ly accomplish the mandated items, and suggested that using the LGA may be <br /> needed to accomplish those mandates. To make key investments in City staff and <br /> provide a 2% COLA at a minimum exclusive of the decisions made for the Com- <br /> pensation Study, Councilmember Etten opined may be better from a broader per- <br /> spective to address those needs in the General Fund versus CIP funding. <br /> Mayor Roe cautioned that, to accomplish everything that should potentially be <br /> done, whether through using LGA funds or reserves, neither of those options was <br /> sustainable; and if the goal was to not use either of those options for the 2015 <br /> budget, it would require a levy increase in 2015. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.