Laserfiche WebLink
Cumulative2004200520062007200820092010201120122013 <br />CPI2.85%5.61%7.22%9.79%13.62%13.11%14.96%18.55%20.89%24.46% <br />COLA - Non union2.30%4.80%7.80%10.80%14.30%17.20%17.20%18.20%19.20%21.20% <br />62 <br />63 <br />The 2013 figure is based on the first 6 months extrapolated over the full year. As this chart <br />64 <br />indicates, over the past 10 years, the cumulative COLA is 3.26% behind the CPI. Over the past <br />65 <br />4 years (2010-2013), the cumulative gap is at 7.35%. Over the past 5 years, the gap is 3.94%. <br />66 <br />67 <br />Implementation Options: <br />Staff has prepared some options (Moderately Competitive, <br />68 <br />Competitive, and Strongly Competitive) for the City Council to consider as they look to <br />69 <br />implement a wage adjustment. It should be noted that a 2% COLA for the 2014 budget will be <br />70 <br />recommended regardless of what option is chosen. It is important that COLA’s are put in place <br />71 <br />not only to remain competitive with the external markets (other cities are reporting that they are <br />72 <br />budgeting 2% COLA increases in 2014) but also to keep pace with the CPI in 2014. Failing to <br />73 <br />include a 2% COLA, even with implementation of one of the options listed below, will quickly <br />74 <br />return the City back to situation we are currently facing. <br />75 <br />It should be noted that these options include an adjustment to the part-time firefighter wages. As <br />76 <br />you will recall, the part-time firefighters were not included in the original compensation study. <br />77 <br />The thought at the time would be to do a separate study on their positions. If the City Council <br />78 <br />chooses the “Moderately Competitive” option, staff feels strongly that the part-time firefighters <br />79 <br />should be included since using the CPI is not a measure of external competitiveness and should <br />80 <br />be applied to all employees. The part-time firefighters have been included in the last two options <br />81 <br />as staff surmises that there is not any interest by the City Council to conduct another <br />82 <br />compensation study. Therefore, the dollar amounts shown in the Budget Implication section <br />83 <br />includes the part-time firefighters getting the compensation adjustment. <br />84 <br />85 <br />Moderately Competitive: <br /> Immediately reclassify the no more than 8 position found to be in <br />86 <br />need of reclassification through the compensation study, immediately implement a 3.26% wage <br />87 <br />adjustment in the first applicable pay period to catch up with the CPI lag for all non-union <br />88 <br />exempt and non-exempt staff including part-time firefighters, and continue funding for merit <br />89 <br />pay. <br />90 <br />91 <br />Competitive: <br /> Immediately reclassify the no more than 8 position found to be in need of <br />92 <br />reclassification through the compensation study, implement the full 4.6% wage adjustment as <br />93 <br />resulted by the compensation study to be at 100% of the average/median for the comparable <br />94 <br />marketplace in stages on January 1, 2014 and July 1, 2014 for all non-union exempt and non- <br />95 <br />exempt employees including part-time firefighters, and eliminate the merit pay plan. <br />96 <br />97 <br />Strongly Competitive: <br /> Immediately reclassify the no more than 8 position found to be in need <br />98 <br />of reclassification through the compensation study, implement the full 4.6% wage adjustment as <br />99 <br />resulted by the compensation study to be at 100% of the average/median for the comparable <br />100 <br />marketplace in stages on January 1, 2014 and July 1, 2014 for all non-union exempt and non- <br />101 <br />exempt employees including part-time firefighters, and continue the merit pay plan to reward <br />102 <br />those that excel <br />103 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />