Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Attachment A <br />Review of Peer Community Compensation Policies and Statements <br /> <br />th <br />Golden Valley: <br />Target is to be at the 66 percentile of the Stanton 5and 6 groups combined <br />wages. This is completed by taking the average for both groups and setting the target at 16% <br />above that average. <br />Woodbury: <br /> The top wage rate in the Full Performer Stage is considered the maximum wage <br />rate for the position classification. This rate is based upon a pay philosophy of 100% of the <br />average maximum wage rate of Stanton V cities with a population of 35,000 and above. When a <br />market analysis for a specific job class indicates the assigned salary range deviates, positively or <br />negatively, from the market by more than 10%, the job class may be placed at an established <br />salary band that most closely corresponds to the applicable market rate. <br />Fridley: Market Review and Adjustments <br /> <br />1.It shall be the responsibility of the Human Resources Director to conduct a comprehensive <br />review of benchmark positions within comparable cities identified as peers in the market. <br /> <br />2.The review and comparisons of market data is required to be completed no less than every <br />three years for key benchmark positions. <br /> <br />3.Peer cities are municipalities which are similar in terms of how services are delivered, the <br />nagers, <br />the City Manager, and affirmed by the City Council. <br /> <br />4.Market data will be obtained from the League of Minnesota Cities, direct requests, and/or <br />legitimate and commonly recognized pay studies where practicable. <br /> <br />5.Any recommendations for adjustments based on market analysis must be made to the City <br />Manager for final approval. <br /> <br />6.From time to time, all salary ranges in the Pay Plan may be adjusted proportionally and <br />collectively through the annual budget process. <br />Richfield: <br />Indicated that the City Manager has his own philosophy of being average or a little <br />higher than average, but it is not policy driven. <br /> <br />Edina: <br /> We need highly talented staff to be able to excel at our mission and achieve our <br />strategic goals. Our compensation system is designed to attract, retain and reward individuals <br />that can build a successful service-based organization. This compensation policy is a guiding <br />document only; the City retains the right to make decisions outside of the policy if the decision <br />supports the objective stated above. <br /> <br />External Market Competitiveness <br />The City needs to compete with other organizations to attract individuals with established track <br />records. One of the primary purposes of the compensation plan is to retain high performing <br />employees and remove pay as a leading reason to leave our organization. For the purpose of <br />evaluating external competitiveness, the City relies primarily on metro-area suburban cities that <br />are similar to Edina in terms of size, location, and development. The current benchmark <br />communities are: Apple Valley, Blaine, Bloomington, Brooklyn Park, Burnsville, Coon Rapids <br />Eagan, Eden Prairie, Hopkins, Lakeville, Maple Grove, Maplewood, Minnetonka, Plymouth, <br /> <br />