2013_0909_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

4.5Because this request is initiated by the City rather than by an outside applicant, the State- 59 mandated 60-day timeline does not apply in this case; this is noted merely to explain the 60 “n/a” (i.e., not applicable) notation in the Application Review Details section above. 61 5.0PZTC ROPOSEDONINGEXT HANGES 62 The proposed are shown in the draft ordinance included with this 63 ZONING TEXT CHANGES bold report as Attachment A; proposed insertions will be represented in text, and 64 proposed deletions will be shown in strikethrough text. A brief discussion of the 65 proposed changes can be found in the paragraphs below. 66 5.1The introductory paragraph of the zoning provision means to establish the intent of the 67 regulations, and several changes are proposed to augment and further clarify the intent. 68 5.2Subsection 2 of this provision is mostly new, but the proposed change reflects the 69 original goal for the regulation. The Residential Storm Water Permit (ReSWP) is a new 70 tool that means to encourage continued investments in aging residential properties by 71 allowing for increases in paved surfaces and building footprints beyond normal code 72 limits so long as appropriate measures are taken to ensure that such improvements don’t 73 cause storm water problems elsewhere. The proposed amendment eliminates most of the 74 technical detail of the original ordinance in order to minimize redundancy and to prevent 75 inconsistencies with the ReSWP requirements. The proposed amendment also clarifies 76 that the ReSWP is not meant to be used for most new or recent home construction nor 77 new property subdivisions that would lead to existing paved surfaces and/or building 78 footprints covering more than the standard 25% or 30% of the newly-configured parcel. 79 6.0PC UBLICOMMENT 80 The duly-noticed public hearing for this proposal was held by the Planning Commission 81 on April 3, 2013, after which the Planning Commission voted unanimously (7-0) to 82 recommend approval of the ;the minutes of the public hearing are 83 ZONING TEXT CHANGE included with this report as Attachment B. As of the time this report was prepared, 84 Planning Division staff has not received any communications from the public. 85 7.0R ECOMMENDATION 86 Based on the comments and findings outlined in Sections 4 – 6 of this report, the 87 Planning Division concurs with the recommendation of the Planning Commission to 88 approve the . 89 ZONING TEXT CHANGE 8.0SA UGGESTEDCTION 90 Pass an ordinance approving the 8.1, based on the comments and ZONING TEXT CHANGE 91 findings of Sections 4 – 6 and the recommendation of Section 7 of this staff report. 92 By motion, approve the proposed ordinance summary for publication. 8.2 93 Prepared by: Associate Planner Bryan Lloyd 651-792-7073 | bryan.lloyd@ci.roseville.mn.us Attachments: A: Draft ordinance C: Draft ordinance summary B: 4/3/2013 public hearing minutes PROJ0017-Improvement_Area-RCA_090913.doc Page 3 of 3