Laserfiche WebLink
HRA Meeting <br />Minutes Tuesday, August 13, 2013 <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />1 <br />Regarding criminal background check information on all renters, Mr. Schlueter questioned <br />2 <br />what was done with that information, and if and when the information could prohibit someone <br />3 <br />renting, or if it depended on the type of infraction. <br />4 <br /> <br />5 <br />Again, Ms. Kelsey clarified that this should be part of the upcoming rental licensing portion of <br />6 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />8 <br />No one else appeared to speak at this time. <br />9 <br /> <br />10 <br />Motion: Member Lee moved, seconded by Member Elkins, to authorize the Request for <br />11 <br />Proposals for the Dale Street Fire Station Redevelopment dated August 14, 2013 <br />12 <br />(Attachment A); <br />- <br />13 <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />15 <br />Ayes: 6 <br />16 <br />Nays: 0 <br />17 <br />Motion carried. <br />18 <br /> <br />19 <br />c. Rental Licensing Ordinance and Implementation Plan <br />20 <br />In her summary comments, Ms. Kelsey reviewed the process for ordinance adoption through <br />21 <br />the City Council. Ms. Kelsey advised that the HRA had simply taken the lead at this stage of <br />22 <br />the process, modeling the proposed Roseville Multi-Family Rental Housing Licensing <br />23 <br />Ordinance currently used by other communities (e.g., Cities of Hopkins and Brooklyn Center) <br />24 <br />for recommendation to the City Council. As detailed in the staff report dated August 13, 2013, <br />25 <br />Ms. Kelsey noted that a tiered system was proposed; and highlighted those revisions made as <br />26 <br />directed by the HRA in previous discussions and incorporating testimonial of rental property <br />27 <br />owners during that process. <br />28 <br /> <br />29 <br />Ms. Kelsey advised that once the City Council received the recommendation from the HRA <br />30 <br />preferably at an upcoming City Council Worksession currently projected for mid-September, <br />31 <br />the process would continue with additional discussions and a formal Public Hearing for <br />32 <br />additional public comment anticipated in October of 2013, depending on discussion at the City <br />33 <br />Council Worksession. <br />34 <br /> <br />35 <br />Chair Maschka noted that, since the Ordinance would not be implemented until 2015, it would <br />36 <br />allow property owners to incorporated fees into their annual operating budgets as applicable. <br />37 <br /> <br />38 <br />Ms. Kelsey clarified that the proposed timeframe would provide sufficient notice time to <br />39 <br />property owners and for fee collection by year-end 2014 for 2015 implementation. <br />40 <br /> <br />41 <br />42 <br />Ms. Kelsey advised that the initial cost of the additional staff should be covered by licensing <br />43 <br />revenue for the first year; and after that baseline was established that determined the number <br />44 <br />and frequency of inspections based on the classification tier of buildings, any budget shortfalls <br />45 <br />would come from the Community Development Department budget, with that budget <br />46 <br />supported 10)% by inspection and building permit fees. <br />47 <br /> <br />48 <br />Public Comment <br />49 <br />Lisa Peilen, Director of Municipal Affairs with the Minnesota Multi-Family Housing <br />50 <br />Association <br />51 <br />On behalf of its members, Ms. Peilen thanked Ms. Kelsey and the HRA for working with the <br />52 <br />Association and <br />53 <br />gratefulness for being willing to revise those fees. Ms. Peilen opined that this brought <br />54 <br />remaining issues down to only a few things needing further tweaking in the proposed <br />55 <br /> <br /> <br />