My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013_0923_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2013
>
2013_0923_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/14/2013 3:42:12 PM
Creation date
9/19/2013 2:38:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
H A G E N , C H R I S T E N S E N & M C I L W A I N <br /> A R C H I T E C T S <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> To: Roseville PRC and From: Tim MclLwain <br /> Design Team Date: 9/20/2013 <br /> Comm. No: 1353 <br /> Subject: Roseville Parks Copies To: File <br /> Park Renewal Program <br /> Responses to City Council Comments from 9.16.2013 meeting <br /> The following are responses to questions and comments received at the Roseville City Council meeting on <br /> 9.16.2013 regarding the final design for the Community Gathering Building at Lexington Park. <br /> 1. The proposed in-floor heating system is redundant with furnace(HVAC)system. <br /> Response: The in-floor heating is very efficient and provides heat and warm surfaces at the <br /> occupied level of the building. The building could be heated an cooled strictly by furnaces <br /> but it would not have the same comfort level. The in-floor heat will be bid as an Alternate <br /> cost. <br /> 2. The building needs to be current in technology(WI-FI,A/V systems,fiber lines). <br /> Response: The budget for the building may not be able to provide for all the desired <br /> technology and systems. The building will be prepped/ready to add those systems in the <br /> future. <br /> 3. The building should have remote monitoring and control of doors <br /> Response: The budget for the building may not be able to provide for all the desired <br /> systems. The hardware and wiring for those devices could reach $2,000 per door. The <br /> building will be prepped/ready to add those systems in the future. <br /> 4. The building needs a more durable exterior(i.e. brick/stone). <br /> Response: The proposed exterior finish is cement-fiber siding (Hardiplank) which is a very <br /> durable and easily maintainable(paint) material. Relative costs for exterior finishes are: <br /> Fiber cement siding = $12.00/SF <br /> Brick= $25.00/SF <br /> Stone = $40.00/SF <br /> 5. The building should have a metal roof(50 year). <br /> Response: The relative costs of roofing are: <br /> Laminated Asphalt Shingles (Timberline type) =$4.00/SF <br /> Wood Shingles = $8.00/SF <br /> Standing Seam Metal = $12.00/SF <br /> P H 6 1 2-9 0 4- 1 3 3 2 FAX 6 1 2-9 0 4-7 3 6 5 _ <br /> 4 2 0 1 CEDAR A V E N U E S O U T H 1 M I N N E A P O L I S, M N 5 5 4 0 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.