My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-09-24_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2013
>
2013-09-24_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2013 3:57:52 PM
Creation date
9/19/2013 3:55:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/24/2013
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
308 <br />it out and varying budgets, with some projects exceeding available funds, while <br />309 <br />others possible if bundled with other projects or as a way to utilize available <br />310 <br />budget funds in certain years. Member DeBenedet rationalized that this was his <br />311 <br />perception in using rankings of #1 — 20; and that he went to any project with a <br />312 <br />score higher than "90" on the original spreadsheet. After that, Member <br />313 <br />DeBenedet advised that he was hesitant to provide further rationale in addressing <br />314 <br />those lower ranked segments beyond that done by the original pathway committee <br />315 <br />to determine their ranking. <br />316 <br />317 <br />Chair Vanderwall suggested reacting in scale for each segment rather than <br />318 <br />providing an absolute ranking in each case over too large of a dimension. <br />319 <br />Page 8 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.