My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0916
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0916
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2013 12:06:10 PM
Creation date
9/24/2013 11:26:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 16,2013 <br /> Page 22 <br /> proposed development at the intersection of County Road B and Lexington Ave- <br /> nue, and his concerns with sight lines at that intersection. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that the issue was addressed in the regulating map, with a <br /> building possible up to the property line,but not necessary. <br /> Councilmember Willmus opined that, in some areas, the City should allow that to <br /> occur as it could create unintended consequence for fairly significant intersec- <br /> tions. <br /> Mr. Paschke noted that it was a balance with that and to avoid not having parking <br /> lots serving as front yards for businesses, another undesirable consequence. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that this was what he liked about the regulating map, it provid- <br /> ed enough flexibility and considered what worked for a particular development, <br /> while still allowing parking no closer than 25'. <br /> Even with busy agendas coming up in the next few weeks, Mr. Trudgeon advised <br /> that staff would like to return for further discussion sooner rather than later to <br /> keep things fresh for everybody and continue making progress. Mr. Trudgeon <br /> summarized that the consensus was to head in separate districts with distinctions <br /> within the CMU designation, which staff would bring back as a draft at the next <br /> opportunity. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that by focusing on CMU sub districts, perhaps including <br /> some with a primary focus on residential, but not precluding all other uses, it sent <br /> a clear message to developers what the City's primary intent was. <br /> 15. City Manager Future Agenda Review <br /> Mr. Trudgeon noted the Closed Executive Session on September 23, 2013, for the pur- <br /> pose of discussing the PIK property acquisition and updates on potential park property <br /> acquisitions, estimating that a minimum of one (1) hour would be needed for that Ses- <br /> sion. <br /> After some discussion, Mayor Roe determined that a 6:00 p.m. start time would go for- <br /> ward. <br /> Councilmember McGehee left at approximately 9:24 pm <br /> 16. Councilmember Initiated Items for Future Meetings <br /> Councilmember Willmus requested that Mr. Trudgeon review current code language re- <br /> garding pervious surfaces related to new construction, in order to address a citizen con- <br /> cern for a property on Owasso Boulevard. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.