My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0916
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0916
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2013 12:06:10 PM
Creation date
9/24/2013 11:26:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 16,2013 <br /> Page 7 <br /> At the request of Councilmember Etten, Dr. Thein touched upon various opportu- <br /> nities for partnership between both school districts and City of Roseville in ad- <br /> dressing the needs of the community's large immigrant populations to make pro- <br /> grams and services more user-friendly and supportive of various cultural distinc- <br /> tions. Dr. Thein offered District 623's support in working with the City, noting <br /> that the District had made significant changes to its hiring practices across the <br /> board to provide a culturally-competent staff. <br /> Mayor Roe thanked Dr. Thein for his presentation and his service to the commu- <br /> nity and School District. <br /> 11. Public Hearings <br /> 12. Budget Items <br /> 13. Business Items (Action Items) <br /> b. Approve Final Design for Lexington Park <br /> Parks & Recreation Director Lonnie Brokke, Park Superintendent Jeff Evenson, <br /> and Tim Mcllwain,partner at Hagen, Christensen & Mcllwain Architects. <br /> Mr. Brokke briefly summarized the request as detailed in the RCA dated Septem- <br /> ber 16, 2013; for final design approval for the Lexington Park Building as pre- <br /> sented. <br /> Mr. Mcllwain reviewed the proposed schematic floor plan and building imag- <br /> es/elevations; including access point and security issues; how the site shaped the <br /> building; types of architectural styles considered; and the aggressive nature of the <br /> process to-date, especially with the value added item for a five (5) week early de- <br /> livery for one (1) project in the Renewal Program within the allotted budget of <br /> $500,000. <br /> Discussion included considerations for energy efficient and green components <br /> and options based on cost efficiencies and various cost analysis comparisons; bal- <br /> ancing of parks and different arrangements for each based on planning models <br /> and site specifics; proposed building use during the winter season as a warming <br /> house and for neighborhood and./or community gatherings; potential redundancy <br /> of dual heating/cooling systems with pricing considered as an alternate; projected <br /> lifespan of the building at fifty (50) years; and functionality versus long-term <br /> maintenance. <br /> Further discussion included projected construction schedule with groundbreaking <br /> anticipated yet this fall depending on weather-related challenges; pre-proposal <br /> contractor meetings scheduled yet this week as detailed in Attachment D of the <br /> RCA; exclusion of the Lexington Pathway connection at this time; access or dual <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.