My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-10-01_PR_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2013
>
2013-10-01_PR_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2013 12:04:06 PM
Creation date
10/2/2013 12:01:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
H A G E N , C H R I S T E N S E N & MCI L W A I N <br />A R C H I T E C T S <br />MEMORANDUM <br />To: Roseville PRC and From: Tim MclLwain <br />Design Team Date: 9/20/2013 <br />Comm. No: 1353 <br />Subject: Roseville Parks Copies To: File <br />Park Renewal Program <br />Responses to City Council Comments from 9.16.2013 meeting <br />The following are responses to questions and comments received at the Roseville City Council meeting on <br />9.16.2013 regarding the final design for the Community Gathering Building at Lexington Park. <br />1. The proposed in -floor heating system is redundant with furnace (HVAC) system. <br />Response: The in -floor heating is very efficient and provides heat and warm surfaces at the <br />occupied level of the building. The building could be heated an cooled strictly by furnaces <br />but it would not have the same comfort level. The in -floor heat will be bid as an Alternate <br />cost. <br />2. The building needs to be current in technology (WI-Fl, AN systems, fiber lines). <br />Response: The budget for the building may not be able to provide for all the desired <br />technology and systems. The building will be prepped /ready to add those systems in the <br />future. <br />3. The building should have remote monitoring and control of doors <br />Response: The budget for the building may not be able to provide for all the desired <br />systems. The hardware and wiring for those devices could reach $2,000 per door. The <br />building will be prepped /ready to add those systems in the future. <br />4. The building needs a more durable exterior (i.e. brick /stone). <br />Response: The proposed exterior finish is cement -fiber siding (Hardiplank) which is a very <br />durable and easily maintainable (paint) material. Relative costs for exterior finishes are: <br />Fiber cement siding = $12.00 /SF <br />Brick = $25.00 /SF <br />Stone = $40.00 /SF <br />5. The building should have a metal roof (50 year). <br />Response: The relative costs of roofing are: <br />Laminated Asphalt Shingles (Timberline type) = $4.00 /SF <br />Wood Shingles = $8.00 /SF <br />Standing Seam Metal = $12.00 /SF <br />PH 6 1 2 - 9 0 4 - 1 3 3 2 FAX 6 1 2- 9 0 4 - 7 3 6 6 <br />4 2 0 1 CEDAR AVENUE S O U T H M IN N E A R O L I S M N 5 5 4 0 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.