Laserfiche WebLink
MOYA <br />398 <br />Map #21 — Rice Street/County Roads C -2 to D <br />399 <br />Mr. Schwartz noted that the composite rankings were reasonable close; with <br />400 <br />Member DeBenedet opining that this result may be from his fine - tuning of his <br />401 <br />individual rankings based on his perception of instructions at the last PWETC <br />402 <br />meeting. <br />403 <br />404 <br />Map #5 - County Road C Sidewalk (Western Avenue to Rice Street) <br />405 <br />Mr. Schwartz questioned if it was appropriate to rank this higher than a segment <br />406 <br />that has no pathway or sidewalk whatsoever. <br />407 <br />A& <br />408 <br />Member Gjerdingen opined that this segment proves that, using the County Road <br />409 <br />D west of Cleveland segment as an example, which had a pretty low ranking, but <br />410 <br />this segment was ranked higher than that. Member Gj erdingen opined that he <br />411 <br />thought this segment from Western to Rice was importan%� <br />412 <br />413 <br />Member Stenlund noted his ranking rationale in not rank it higher if another <br />414 <br />option across the road was already available for any particular segment. <br />415 <br />h A(Mwhis <br />416 <br />Member DeBenedet noted that he failed to own rationale r this <br />417 <br />segment to remain consistent with his similar co m ents on the Lexington Avenue <br />418 <br />pathway already existing on one side. <br />419 <br />420 <br />Member Felice opined that the distinction should be based on how busy the <br />421 <br />422 <br />roadway was. <br />Nor <br />441 <br />Page 10 of 19 <br />