My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-09-24_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
2013-09-24_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2013 2:47:09 PM
Creation date
10/24/2013 2:46:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/24/2013
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Roseville Public Works, Environment <br /> and Transportation Commission <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> Tuesday, September 24, 2013, at 6:30 p.m. <br /> City Council Chambers, 2660 Civic Center Drive <br /> Roseville, Minnesota 55113 <br /> 1. Introduction /Call Roll <br /> Vice Chair Stenlund called the meeting to order at approximately 6:30 p.m. <br /> Members Present: Vice Chair Dwayne Stenlund; and Members Jim <br /> DeBenedet; Steve Gjerdingen; and Joan Felice <br /> Members Excused: Chair Jan Vanderwall <br /> Staff Present: Public Works Director Duane Schwartz <br /> 2. Public Comments <br /> 3. Approval of August 27, 2013 Meeting Minutes <br /> Member DeBenedet moved, Member Gjerdingen seconded, approval of the <br /> August 27, 2013, meeting as amended. <br /> Corrections: <br /> • Page 9, lines 368-372 (Gjerdingen) <br /> Correct to read: "Member Stenlund expressed a desire to rank projects to <br /> remove or avoid bottlenecks of those that would require a large CIP <br /> expenditure to work. Member Gjerdingen brought up Mr. Stenlund's earlier <br /> comment about ranking projects according to what year they should be done <br /> and suggested that such ranking would not be relevant, and since some of the <br /> streets were already scheduled on the CIP and some not, it would be simpler <br /> to base prioritization from#1 — 5 simply on the merits of each segment." <br /> Ayes: 4 <br /> Nays: 0 <br /> Motion carried. <br /> 4. Communication Items <br /> Public Works Director Schwartz noted that updates on various construction <br /> projects were included in tonight's meeting packet and available on-line at the <br /> Page 1 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.