My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-09-24_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
2013-09-24_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2013 2:47:09 PM
Creation date
10/24/2013 2:46:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/24/2013
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Member Stenlund offered to provide services for a Capstone monitoring project to <br /> determine the usage and prove people were using the painted strip versus the off- <br /> road pathway over a period of time. <br /> In his ranking rationale, Member Gjerdingen noted that he had assumed that not <br /> all projects would be done in tandem; and if options or segments were <br /> consolidated, he would still rank the Alta Vista Drive (Map #34 —Alta Vista <br /> Drive) and the Pineview Court segment on Dale Street similarly with a "Y' <br /> Member Felice noted that she had ranked Alta Vista as a"1" and she would also <br /> consider this as a "1" if a connection all the way on Alta Vista was attained. <br /> Member Felice opined that there needed to be a pathway to somehow completely <br /> traverse down Dale Street; and she found this preferable to one on-road. <br /> Member Stenlund opined that the City Council may take the PWETC's <br /> recommendations to fund the top ten from this list with funds they have available; <br /> or they may choose to perform their own ranking. Member Stenlund suggested <br /> that the PWETC recommend anything over 2.18 for the highest priority to be <br /> considered the first year of the pathway build-out plan. <br /> Member DeBenedet opined that his goal was to aim for a recommendation to the <br /> City Council of approximately $5 million over a period of 10-years for a realistic <br /> build-out plan. <br /> In attempting to recalculate composite rankings, Member DeBenedet reviewed <br /> those segments or options to remove and/or adjust: <br /> • Map #20: Recalculate/increase ranking for Dale Street(Option 1 <br /> Combination) Roselawn to Pineview Court AND on-road (parallel to Dale <br /> Street on Pineview Court and A1taVisa Drive) <br /> • Map #25: Eliminate NE Diagonal Trail Connection (Option 2 along the <br /> railroad r-o-w south of County Road C from Cleveland to Walnut) <br /> • Map #16: Eliminate Victoria Street north of County Road C (Option 1: <br /> combination) with further adjustments and re-combinations indicated (e.g. <br /> County Roads C to C-2 ranked lower; County Road C-2 to Millwood as <br /> Option, with a determination pending as to the best choice of an on- or off- <br /> road option). <br /> From his recollection and notes, Member Gjerdingen advised that for a <br /> combination, he thought County Road C-2 to Millwood had always been <br /> considered for an on-road option; Victoria Street to County Road C-2 talked <br /> about as off-road or a mixture of off- and on-road. Member Gjerdingen also <br /> noted that the Millwood Avenue to County Road D segment south would be <br /> off-road on the trail. <br /> Member DeBenedet concurred with that recollection, referencing the <br /> spreadsheet. Regarding the Millwood Avenue to County Road D segment <br /> Page 7 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.