My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_1014
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_1014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2013 8:37:24 AM
Creation date
10/29/2013 8:37:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/14/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 14, 2013 <br /> Page 15 <br /> Ms. Giga concurred with Mayor Roe that there was no distinction in sidewalks or <br /> pathways other than sidewalks were typically constructed of concrete and path- <br /> ways of asphalt; however, she noted they were also interchangeable terms at <br /> times. <br /> Liability Issues <br /> Mayor Roe clarified that, except in commercial areas where maintenance was the <br /> responsible of business owners, the City was responsible for maintenance in resi- <br /> dential areas, with this corridor treated no differently than areas with existing <br /> sidewalks. <br /> Street Parking on County Road B-2 <br /> Mr. Schwartz clarified that the audience was correct in their interpretation that <br /> parking was allowed on most segments of County Road B-2, other than closer to <br /> Lexington Avenue. <br /> Mayor Roe recognized that some driveway parking area may be lost,but noted his <br /> observation that he frequently saw people parking across sidewalks, even though <br /> it wasn't encouraged. <br /> Mr. Schwartz clarified that the City had an ordinance prohibiting parking that <br /> blocked pathways, and while it still occurred, it was illegal. <br /> Tree Removal Process and How Determined <br /> Ms. Giga advised that while some trees had been preliminarily identified for re- <br /> moval by the City's Forester, with conversations begun with affected property <br /> owners, the Elm tree referenced had been identified and removal of it was trying <br /> to be avoided. However, Ms. Giga reiterated that this was part of the final design <br /> process, yet to occur, and determination of those trees that were diseased or hav- <br /> ing issues. Ms. Giga assured the public and City Council that staff would contin- <br /> ue to work with individual property owners on their specific areas of concern. <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, Ms. Giga advised that the cost of replacement trees <br /> was paid by the City of Roseville and included in project costs. <br /> Hydrant Locations <br /> Ms. Giga noted that some hydrants would need to relocated or adjusted outside of <br /> the project area. <br /> Stormwater Requirements <br /> Ms. Giga reiterated that staff would continue to meet with and be available to in- <br /> dividual residents to address drainage issues. <br /> Snow Removal <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.