Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,October 14,2013 <br /> Page 27 <br /> Councilmember Laliberte expressed her interest in updating the definition; how- <br /> ever, she was not in favor of having vaping/sampling lounges; and was not sure <br /> about extending it to other facilities (e.g. restaurant and e-cigarette and white va- <br /> por) if someone is 18 years old and is legal to sell and buy these items, she opined <br /> that she wasn't sure she was ready to legislate people's behavior by their own <br /> choosing. <br /> City Attorney Gaughan addressed how difficult this issue is, and for the City <br /> Council to keep in mind, that their authority to enact this comes from the Minne- <br /> sota Indoor Air Quality Act, with the City allowed to be even more stringent <br /> about second hand smoke. City Attorney Gaughan advised that the questions in- <br /> clude: <br /> • What is second hand smoke? <br /> • What product(s) constitute smoking even if containing nicotine, even if <br /> they're not lit? <br /> City Attorney Gaughan noted that his point was that there is going to be a lot of <br /> uncertainty in what a city can or cannot do regarding these regulations. <br /> In just considering the definition itself and the proposed amendment, Mr. <br /> Gaughan questioned if it included or banned any device or substance, and whether <br /> this included or excluded nebulizers; or if it just applied to water vapor without <br /> any other chemicals. Mr. Gaughan noted that it was getting into an area of prod- <br /> ucts that were unknown and which area of the Minnesota Clean Air Act frame- <br /> work could the City impose. Mr. Gaughan noted that several cities had enacted <br /> amendments to their ordinances regarding e-cigarettes and those not containing <br /> nicotine; but it was important for the City to keep in mind the uncertainty of <br /> whether or not those ordinances will be effective or be held up in a court of law. <br /> Mayor Roe questioned if the City of Roseville wanted to be one of those test cas- <br /> es or not. Mayor Roe questioned if there was any problem in the definition as <br /> proposed or in adding a use component, except for items used for medical rea- <br /> sons, or whether the City should get into it or not. <br /> City Attorney Gaughan advised that he didn't know what to suggest for appropri- <br /> ate language at this time. <br /> Mayor Roe stated that he was fine with the proposed language as recommended. <br /> Ms. Anderson advised that their organization had information about exemptions <br /> for FDA-approved inhalers for tobacco cessation and nebulizers if requested. <br /> Mayor Roe asked that she provide that information to staff for the next City <br /> Council meeting when the definition was under consideration. <br />