My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_9812
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
09xxx
>
9800
>
res_9812
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 8:40:54 AM
Creation date
12/2/2004 10:30:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
9812
Resolution Title
Adopting and Confirming as Amended 2000 Assessments for Improvements P-99-02-19, P-99-02-22, P-99-02-23, P-9913
Resolution Date Passed
9/11/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2 <br /> <br />opportunity has been given to all interested persons to present their objections, if any, to <br />such proposed assessments. <br /> <br />4. This Council, having heard and considered all objections so presented, and being fully <br />advised in the premises, finds that each of the lots, pieces, and parcels of land enumerated <br />in the proposed assessment was and is specifically benefited by the construction of said <br />improvement in not less than the amount of the assessment set opposite the description of <br />each such lot, piece, and parcel of land, respectively, and such amount so set out is hereby <br />levied against each of the respective lots, pieces and parcels of land therein. <br /> <br />5. The proposed assessments are hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper special <br />assessments for each of said lots, pieces, or parcels of land, respectively, and the assessment <br />against each parcel, together with interest at the rate of7.5% per annum accruing on the full <br />amount thereof from time to time unpaid, shall be a lien concurrent with general taxes upon <br />such parcel and all thereof. The total amount of each such assessment shall be payable in <br />equal annual principal installments extending over a period of fifteen (15) years, the first of <br />said installments, together with interest on the entire assessment from the date hereof to <br />December 31, 2001, to be payable with general taxes for the year 2000, collectible in 2001, <br />and one of each of the remaining installments, together with one year's interest on that and <br />all other unpaid installments, to be payable with general taxes for each consecutive year <br />thereafter until the entire assessment is paid. <br /> <br />6. If the adopted assessment differs from the proposed assessment as to any particular lot, <br />piece, or parcel of land, the manager shall mail to the owner a notice stating the amount of <br />the adopted assessment. The manager must also notify affected owners of any changes <br />adopted by the Council in interest rates or prepayment requirements from those contained in <br />the notice of the proposed assessment. <br /> <br />7. Prior to the certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, the owner of any lot, <br />piece, or parcel of land assessed hereby may at any time pay the whole of such assessment, <br />with interest to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, but no interest shall be charged if <br />such payment is made within 30 days after the date of this resolution. <br /> <br />8. The City Manager shall forthwith prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a certified <br />duplicate of the assessment roll, with each installment and interest on each unpaid <br />assessment set forth separately, to be extended upon the proper tax lists of the County, and <br />the County Auditor shall thereafter collect such assessments in the manner provided by law. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />Maschka and upon roll call vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br />Maschka, Wiski, Goedeke, Mastel, and Kysylyczyn and the following voted against the same: <br />none. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.