Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 21, 2013 <br /> Page 29 <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that, in order for the CIP to be fully sustainable <br /> by 2020, it would require $1.4 million annually; and noted that this fell far short <br /> of that goal for funding $225,000 annually, an ongoing issue that had created the <br /> current situation, and the need to use debt service to address infrastructure issues. <br /> At a very minimum, Councilmember McGehee opined that funding for 2014 <br /> should be consistent with those decisions made just two years ago and not imme- <br /> diately make cuts to the CIP. <br /> Councilmember Etten agreed that this was an important priority, and in capping <br /> the levy and taking $50,000 or more from another source, this was a one-time <br /> compromise and may represent a short-term levy investment. Councilmember Et- <br /> ten noted that this may put the CIP further in arrears, but may be necessary to get <br /> the levy where it needed to be in 2014. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that the thought had been to look in 2015 to get the levy funding <br /> back in; thus only losing one year of the twenty year CIP and not selling the City <br /> too short; an approach that he could support for 2014. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon advised that additional discussion was scheduled for next week's <br /> meeting, including the Volunteer Coordinator Position. <br /> Mr. Miller noted that the Utility Rates were currently slated for the November 18, <br /> 2013 meeting; and represented the only lingering big ticket item that hadn't been <br /> discussed at length yet. <br /> If the City Council had additional specific topics for discussion, Mr. Trudgeon <br /> and Mr. Miller asked that they let staff know. <br /> At the request of Mr. Trudgeon as to whether the City Council wanted to discuss <br /> COLA next week, Mayor Roe suggested that the City Council may not be pre- <br /> pared to do that quite that soon. <br /> 12. Business Items (Action Items) <br /> a. Consider Policy on Annual Staff Cost of Living Adjustments <br /> Mayor Roe noted that staff was presenting proposed policy language for City <br /> Council consideration based on the City Council's direction, specifically as de- <br /> tailed in lines 7 — 10 of the RCA dated October 21, 2013. Mayor Roe clarified <br /> that this was not intended as a hard and fast rule that is considered automatic, but <br /> to be used during budget discussions, and still at the discretion of the City Council <br /> with flexibility built in. If the Council preferred to have a more formal policy, <br /> Mayor Roe suggested that it be done in ordinance format. <br />