Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 21,2013 <br /> Page 8 <br /> ing that health risks were insignificant and presented no health issue to bystand- <br /> ers. <br /> Mr. Kester opined that this substantiated his assertion that there was no reason to <br /> ban public use of e-cigarettes indoors from a public health standpoint; and further <br /> opined that it wasn't good to have laws dictating what people could do on their <br /> own property just because some people didn't like it, and further opined that this <br /> should be left to their discretion. If, for instance, Rosedale Center received a sig- <br /> nificant number of complaints, they could take it upon themselves to address the <br /> issue on their own private property. As a seller of e-cigarettes since early 2011, <br /> Mr. Kester advised that they had received no complaints from Rosedale Center <br /> management on those products or their use on-site. Mr. Kester noted that banning <br /> e-cigarettes had consequences, and any law stigmatizing electronic cigarettes <br /> would dissuade people from their use and move them back to tobacco products, <br /> proven unhealthy. <br /> From a business standpoint, Mr. Kester noted the impacts on his business if this <br /> vital part of allowing customers to sample the products was no longer allowed; <br /> and if disallowed at Rosedale Center, he would likely have to close their kiosks <br /> and move elsewhere. Mr. Kester noted that some cities had chosen to take drastic <br /> measures similar to this with no exemption for retail stores selling the product,but <br /> opined that those were only a minority. Mr. Kester referenced a recently adopted <br /> ordinance by the City of Roseville requiring a license for sale of electronic ciga- <br /> rettes; and advised that he would support that type of ordinance to allow the City <br /> to regulate sales to minors. <br /> Mr. Kester advised that his company did not even allow a minor (under the age of <br /> 18) into their facility, and definitely not any sampling, and had been their compa- <br /> ny policy and business practice even before it became State law. <br /> Barry Shortell, speaking on behalf of another electronic cigarette store in <br /> Roseville <br /> Mr. Shortell asked for more clarification on sampling, and despite their ultimate <br /> decision, asked that at the very least, the City Council abstain from disallowing <br /> sampling until other metropolitan cities have made similar decisions to avoid <br /> businesses in adjacent communities still able to offer sampling from continuing to <br /> operate that would result in a loss of customers to Roseville. Mr. Shortell refer- <br /> enced studies saying the use of e-cigarettes provided a healthier and more effec- <br /> tive tool for smoking cessation; with the FDA continuing to look into other prod- <br /> ucts as well. Mr. Shortell asked that the City Council delay any action until the <br /> FDA ruling came forward. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee regarding verification of whether <br /> products were being sold to minors, Chief Mathwig advised that the compliance <br /> checks were performed by his depai Intent twice each year, for tobacco and alco- <br />