My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_9816
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
09xxx
>
9800
>
res_9816
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 8:40:55 AM
Creation date
12/2/2004 10:30:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
9816
Resolution Title
Approving Variances from Section 1016.22.A1 (Non-Conformities), Section 1016.26.B1 (Storm Water Management) , Section 1616.16 (Structures Design Standards), and Section 1004.02d5 (Swelling Dimensions and Appearances and Height, Frontage yard and Lot
Resolution Date Passed
9/25/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />WHEREAS, because of the concerns expressed by the Department of Natural Resources <br />(DNR) the proposed accessory structure has been placed on the front (east) property line; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the request on <br />Wednesday, September 13,2000, and recommended approval (6-0) ofthe requested variances, subject <br />to the following: <br /> <br />Whereas, the Planning Commission finds that a strict application of the City Code <br />would work an unusual hardship on the applicant; and <br /> <br />Whereas, specifically, the unique physical features or the parcel and its limited <br />buildable area prevents the applicant from providing adequate garage space without a <br />variance; and <br /> <br />Whereas, the hardship was not created by the applicant; and <br /> <br />Whereas, the granting of the variance will not significantly impact the health, safety or <br />general welfare of the community; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council received the Planning Commission's recommendation <br />on Monday, September 25,2000; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council made the following findings: <br /> <br />1 Section 10116.22A1 (Non-Conformities) stipulates that non-conformities can continue but are <br />subject to applicable State Statutes and City Ordinance regarding alterations, repair after <br />damage, discontinuance of use, and intensification of use. <br /> <br />2 Section 1016.26B1 (Storm Water Management) requires all single-family lots within the <br />Shoreland Management District to have no more that 25% impervious site coverage. <br /> <br />3 Section 1016.16 (Structure Design Standards) requires structures to be set back a minimum of <br />75 feet from the ordinary high watermark (OHW). <br /> <br />4 Section 1004.02D5 (Dwelling Dimensions and Appearances and Height, Frontage, Yard and <br />Lot Area Requirements in R-1 Districts) requires a front yard setback of 30 feet. <br /> <br />5 The property located at 2985 Lexington Avenue is an odd shaped parcel, has topographical <br />challenges such as steep slopes, mature trees and has no reasonable alternative without <br />impacting similar setback requirements. The parcel slopes up from the water's edge south <br />towards Josephine Road, rising 12 to 14 feet to the south property line. <br /> <br />6 Due to the tuck under garage, the site has additional pavement to facilitate the proper <br />movement of vehicles from the garage to Lexington Avenue. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.