Laserfiche WebLink
Memo <br />To: <br />Parks & RecreationCommission <br />Lonnie Brokke,Parks & Recreation Director <br />From: <br />Chris Miller, Finance Director <br />Date: <br />October28,2013 <br />Re: <br />Discussion on Parks & Recreation Capital Improvement & Park Improvement Plans <br />Background <br />Over the past few years, both the Parks & Recreation Commission and City Council have held <br />discussions regarding the possible formation of a Parks & Recreation Board. If the Board is created, it <br />will likely be charged with reviewing the long-term capital asset needs ofthe parks and recreation <br />system. This memo identifies the primary interests associated with that review. <br />As of December 31, 2012 the City’s parks and recreation system included nearly $30million in capital <br />assets. A summary of these assets is shown inthe table below. <br />Est. Life <br />Asset TypeValue(Years) <br />Land$ 10,892,421n/a <br />Buildings12,085,99040 <br />Equipment5,870,4805-10 <br />Vehicles1,009,2525-10 <br />Total$29,858,143 <br />Generally speaking, the land portion of these system assets will not require any on-going maintenance <br />or replacement. The remaining asset categories will need to be incorporated into a long-term capital <br />asset replacement plan. <br />It’s important to note that the value of these assets is stated in historical termsor the cost incurred at <br />the time the assets were acquired.To replace these assets in today’s dollars will be significantly <br />higher.Therefore to properly assess the long-term financial impacts of sustaining the parks and <br />recreation system, we must not only look at the useful life of each asset, we must continually adjust for <br />future price increases. <br />This process is carried out with the annual update of the Parks & Recreation Capital Improvement Plan <br />(CIP), and the Park Improvement Plan (PIP). Each of these Plans andfinancing options is addressed <br />separately below. <br />1 <br /> <br />