My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-11-19_agenda_packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Housing Redevelopment Authority
>
Agendas and Packets
>
2013
>
2013-11-19_agenda_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2013 8:20:46 AM
Creation date
11/20/2013 8:20:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/19/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HRA Meeting <br />Minutes – Tuesday, October 15, 2013 <br />Page 9 <br />1 <br />tax credit developments completed to-date, based on their practice and reputation in delivering quality <br />2 <br />products. <br />3 <br />4 <br />At the request of Ms. Kelsey, Mr. Eilers confirmed that a total number of 73 rental units were proposed; <br />5 <br />with 9 townhomes; that demolition costs, SAC and WAC had been included in their projected <br />6 <br />construction costs in the proposal; and beyond the $100,000 purchase price of the land, they were <br />7 <br />requesting no additional financial assistance from Roseville. Mr. Eilers reviewed their projected project <br />8 <br />timeframe, if financing was established in 2014, construction in 2015, and 6-month lease-up period; <br />9 <br />anticipating occupancy by the spring of 2016. Given the size of this project, and their past experience <br />10 <br />in managing various properties across three states, Mr. Eilers advised that they anticipated a full-time, <br />11 <br />on-site property manager <br />12 <br />13 <br />At the request of Ms. Kelsey, Ms. Myer provided a summary for their intent to preserve existing trees <br />14 <br />and include new growth, as realistic to the site itself and development; hoping to utilize several of the <br />15 <br />mature trees as site amenities in open space. While the project requires a level of density, Ms. Myer <br />16 <br />recognized that buffering between single-family and the multi-family building, as well as connecting to <br />17 <br />the community were all important aspects in a final site design. <br />18 <br />19 <br />At the request of Member Willmus, Ms. Myer noted that for the 73 units, 63 below grade and 18 above <br />20 <br />grade parking stalls were proposed for the multi-family building; and consolidated parking lot stalls to <br />21 <br />address the community feeling for the townhomes and courtyards for them. <br />22 <br />23 <br />Public Comment <br />24 <br />Kari Gelly, 777 Lovell Avenue <br />25 <br />Ms. Gelly sought clarification on the client anticipated for renters in “affordable rate” rental units; and <br />26 <br />questioned if they would be open to people having government assistance or fully employed, and the <br />27 <br />parameters for affordable housing. Ms. Gelly also questioned how the units would be marketed. <br />28 <br />29 <br />Mr. Eilers clarified the definition of “affordable housing,” often referred to as workforce housing; <br />30 <br />noting that CommonBond tried to keep the majority of its units with income ceilings based on a <br />31 <br />percentage of median income. Mr. Eilers advised that these would not be Section 8 HUD housing units, <br />32 <br />but renters would pay full rent, with those rents charged slightly below market rate. Mr. Eilers advised <br />33 <br />that proposed rents would be between $900 and $1,050 depending on the size of the unit; and <br />34 <br />anticipated that the population for this building would include working families, singles and the elderly, <br />35 <br />a mix which their sites invited. Mr. Eilers noted that the majority of market rate apartments would have <br />36 <br />no income restrictions; but that the affordable housing tax credit equity did include a ceiling as to how <br />37 <br />much a tenant could make to live in a unit. <br />38 <br />39 <br />Regarding marketing, Mr. Eilers advised that they typically did outreach to all types of populations <br />40 <br />through all available media; and would work with the City and HRA for referrals for that marketing, <br />41 <br />seeking as many viable options as possible. <br />42 <br />43 <br />Ken Warwick, 748 Grandview <br />44 <br />In his personal calculations of parking spaces with this proposal, Mr. Warwick questioned the <br />45 <br />availability of parking with the units; whether below grade or in the parking lots; and questioned the <br />46 <br />number of 3-bedroom units in the multi-family building. Mr. Warwick expressed concern with the need <br />47 <br />for on-street parking and activity due to not providing sufficient parking on site. <br />48 <br />49 <br />Mr. Eilers estimated 15-16, 3-bedroom units. <br />50 <br />51 <br />Ms. Myer advised that the proposed parking was a starting point to reach the sustainable growth goal, <br />52 <br />and provided 1 to 1 parking. As they worked with the community as project development moved <br />53 <br />forward, Ms. Myer advised that more parking could be incorporated to the north to accommodate <br />54 <br />several more stalls. Ms. Myer reminded all that this was only a concept plan to be used as a starting <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.