2013-10-15_HRA_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

HRA Meeting Minutes –Tuesday, October 15, 2013 Page 10 1 point for criteria for the proposal; and based on their review of the community meetings held as part of 2 their due diligence. 3 4 Michelle Harris, 597 Cope 5 Ms. Harrisrequested the top ceiling for income; with Mr. Eilers responding that it depended on the 6 number of people living in a particular unit. 7 8 Amanda Novak, Associate VP of Development for CommonBond 9 Ms. Novak responded in more detail to Ms. Harris, reviewing area median income as calculated by 10 particular counties, with Ramsey County currently using $80,000 as an average income for a family of 11 4; and affordable housing guidelines typically at 50% of that, or $40,000. Ms. Novak noted that it 12 varied depending on the number of people being served; but the county median income calculations set 13 that ceiling and rent set at a level, not based on income, but in order to live in that building you couldn’t 14 make more than that ceiling. 15 16 Ms. Harris opined that the front entrance at Cope and Dale seemed confusion to her, and questioned 17 how it was accessed. 18 19 Ms. Myer responded that the main entrance adjacent to the sidewalks was intended as a guest entrance 20 to the building; with residents accessing the building through the drive entry to underground parking 21 and elevators to their units. Ms. Myer advised that the intent of the main entry focus is to enhance that 22 corner for solidity and presence, creating a gateway into the project community; with walk-ups on the 23 first floor of the building. 24 25 Ms. Harris questioned what mode of transportation was intended, since there didn’t seem to be any 26 parking for visitors. 27 28 Ms. Myer advised that there were a few spots intended for visitors; and more could be incorporated 29 between the concept and final design stages, including some underground visitor parking, potentially 30 adding another 40 stalls. 31 32 Mr. Chris Saar, 840 Grandview 33 Recognizing that transparency may be an intent and management decision in allowing access from 34 several points, Mr. Saarquestioned the distance from the corner of the project to the heart. 35 36 Member Elkins sought the distance from the farthest unit to the parking stall; with Ms. Myer estimating 37 150’ distance. However, Ms. Myer recognized that the parking amenities were a good point to 38 reconsider, she again reminded that this was a schematic proposal; and expressed her confidence that 39 adjustments would be made before final design; and reiterated that their intent was to avoid having the 40 parking lot take up a large part of thesite in order to emphasize a green, open and active space. 41 42 Chair Maschka noted that this project site was not on a bus line and would require sufficient vehicle 43 parking and traffic. 44 45 With applause from the audience, Chair Maschka thanked presenters for their nice presentation and 46 concepts. 47 General Public Comment 48 Member Willmus encouraged residents, as they further review tonight’s proposals and thought about 49 them more, to contact him with their feedback, via website or phone. 50 51 Chair Maschka invited and encouraged audience members to express their comments now if they chose 52 to do so, or at a later date, at their discretion. 53 54 Ken Hartman