My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-10-15_HRA_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Housing Redevelopment Authority
>
Minutes
>
2013
>
2013-10-15_HRA_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2013 8:21:47 AM
Creation date
11/20/2013 8:21:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/15/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HRA Meeting <br />Minutes –Tuesday, October 15, 2013 <br />Page 8 <br />1 <br />all with the intent of providing lifestyle residential services and amenities. Specific to the Dale Street <br />2 <br />Project, Mr. Eilers outlined their overall vision and housing goals for the site to encourage a unified <br />3 <br />community and neighborhood, through development of 9 townhomes, and a 64-unit multi-family <br />4 <br />building of various sized units, some at market rate, but all including green development initiatives. <br />5 <br />6 <br />Shawna Myer, BKV Group –Architecture Firm; 222 North Second Street; Minneapolis, MN <br />7 <br />Ms. Myer provided a history of CommonBond in the housing area and community building, using <br />8 <br />various sites, project sizes and concepts. Ms. Myer reviewed three aspects for this site that incorporated <br />9 <br />the site and amenities, housing and sustainable growth goals. Ms. Myer noted that part of that <br />10 <br />sustainable growth would be determined in how the street front of the buildings was activated with the <br />11 <br />community (e.g. benches and rain gardens to invite the neighborhood to pause and interact); and <br />12 <br />provided an appropriate scaleof urban amenities for this site. Ms. Myer noted that those visual interests <br />13 <br />could also be incorporated into the site’s storm water management plan. <br />14 <br />15 <br />Ms. Myer reviewed the specific plans for the site, including plans for 63 parkingstalls at level (1 per <br />16 <br />unit for the 3-story building); various sizes of units for a mix of 1, 2 and 3 bedrooms; common areas <br />17 <br />and amenities; and provided schematic elevations to help visualize what the site could offer to residents <br />18 <br />and the broader community. <br />19 <br />20 <br />Mr. Eilers addressed a preliminary development schedule and financing as detailed in their proposal; <br />21 <br />with the vast majority of the funding for the project coming through tax credits with the MHFA for the <br />22 <br />land, a county HOME grant for construction, MN Housing architects; and federal home loan for <br />23 <br />financing, CommonBond reserves, and tax credits. Mr. Eilers noted that the tax credit application <br />24 <br />process was competitive and based on availability of funding, but during that process, other funds could <br />25 <br />be put in place and soft fundsacquired. Mr. Eilers clarified that CommonBond was not seeking any <br />26 <br />financial participation from the City other than $100,000 for the land acquisition, but not requesting any <br />27 <br />TIF or $1 land sale; opining that they did not feel that it would be necessary for the development. <br />28 <br />29 <br />Ms. Myer highlighted the Green Communities aspect, and their experiences to date in addressing their <br />30 <br />firm’s sustainable growth goals, as well as those of the Roseville community. <br />31 <br />32 <br />At the request of Chair Maschka, Mr. Eilers clarifiedthat CommonBond would handle all land rentals <br />33 <br />and property management to ensure quality properties that were run well and under long-term <br />34 <br />ownership of CommonBond. <br />35 <br />36 <br />At the request of Member Willmus, Mr. Eilers addressed income eligibility requirements to provide <br />37 <br />affordable or “workforce” housing, that would have some income ceilings, but not considered <br />38 <br />subsidized. <br />39 <br />40 <br />At the request of Member Lee, Mr. Eilers addressed the use and mix of tax credits and other sources of <br />41 <br />income, as well as private mortgages and/or permanent mortgages through the MN Housing Finance <br />42 <br />Agency; however, he reiterated that those mortgage issues would not be problematic providing other <br />43 <br />financing sources were realized. Mr. Eilers noted that 5 units in the multi-family building were <br />44 <br />proposed as market rate rentals with this preliminary concept plan; and estimated no less than 4, but no <br />45 <br />more than 10 home units based on regulations. <br />46 <br />47 <br />Member Quam questioned recent data and availability of tax credits through the State Allocator, and the <br />48 <br />current supply/demand ratio for allocations in general; and how many CommonBond projects had been <br />49 <br />successfully submitted in the past. <br />50 <br />51 <br />While not having all of the allocation data immediately available, Mr. Eilers advised that he could get <br />52 <br />that information outside tonight’s meeting and provide it to HRA staff for forwarding to the HRA <br />53 <br />Board. Mr. Eilers advised that CommonBond had been very successful to-date in their tax credit <br />54 <br />applications, with approximately 75% of their requests being successful over the last2 years; with 60 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.