My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_9826
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
09xxx
>
9800
>
res_9826
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 8:41:00 AM
Creation date
12/2/2004 10:30:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
9826
Resolution Title
Approving a Minor Subdivision at 500 Roselawn Avenue
Resolution Date Passed
10/23/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />C. The City policy is to accept parkland or cash in lieu of land dedicationfor the creation of <br />new lots. In this case, cash will be accepted in lieu of parkland dedication. The <br />dedication fee is $500.00 for the newly created Parcel B. The fee will be collected prior <br />to issuance of a building permit on said Parcel B. <br /> <br />D. Deferred assessments of$1,532.50 (street) and $829.56 (storm sewer) must be paid to <br />the City prior to the quit claim being signed by the City. <br /> <br />E. The City policy is to accept a Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) upon the issuance of a <br />building permit. In this case, a SAC fee is required and will be collected upon the <br />issuance of a building permit for Parcel B. <br /> <br />F. The City Engineer must review and approve the driveway access along McCarrons <br />Boulevard South prior to the issuance of building permits. The attached survey indicates <br />a generalized access area. <br /> <br />G. The applicant must record the two lot minor subdivision within 60 days after the <br />approval of the City Council. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council <br />Member Mastel, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Goedeke, <br />Maschka, Wiski, Mastel and Kysylyczyn <br />and the following voted against the same: None <br /> <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.