Laserfiche WebLink
The total citywide value of the discounts is approximately $290,000 annually. This represents <br />the amount of water and sewer charges that are shifted from households that get the discount to <br />those that don't. <br />To put this in a different context, if the senior discount program was eliminated, the standard fee <br />would be reduced as follows: <br />Standard <br />Amount <br />Discount <br />Amount <br />Difference <br />% Diff. <br />Water Base Fee (per quarter) <br />$ 49.50 <br />$ 32.15 <br />$ (17.35) <br />Sanitary Sewer Base Fee (qtr.) <br />37.35 <br />23.30 <br />(14.05) <br />Total <br />$ 86.85 <br />$ 55.45 <br />$ (31.40) <br />-36% <br />The total citywide value of the discounts is approximately $290,000 annually. This represents <br />the amount of water and sewer charges that are shifted from households that get the discount to <br />those that don't. <br />To put this in a different context, if the senior discount program was eliminated, the standard fee <br />would be reduced as follows: <br />Discussion Issues <br />In evaluating the relevance of any existing public assistance program, it's important to reflect <br />upon why the program was created in the first place and whether those objectives have been met. <br />In this particular case, the Program was created to achieve a specific outcome — to encourage <br />homeowners to connect to the municipal system. Clearly this primary objective was achieved <br />long ago. <br />This raises the question as to what the Program's current objectives are. Intuitively one could <br />surmise that one of the remaining objectives is to provide assistance to those that have limited <br />financial means. However, the Program does not feature any means testing. Recipients merely <br />have to sign an affidavit signifying that they're drawing social security or are at or below federal <br />poverty guidelines. Currently, only a handful of homeowners are receiving the discount because <br />they are below the federal poverty guidelines. <br />This discussion has taken place at the Council level on several occasions in the past decade. <br />Each time, the Council has taken no action. Given the significant financial shift that is <br />occurring, the Council is advised to carefully consider whether the Program's objectives are still <br />relevant. That consideration should be made with the understanding that the number of <br />recipients in the Program is expected to steadily expand over the next 10 years under current <br />eligibility criteria. <br />This expansion will make it financially advantageous for older homeowners, while <br />simultaneously making it financially more difficult for younger ones. <br />Standard <br />Amount <br />Revised <br />Amount <br />Difference <br />% Diff. <br />Water Base Fee (per quarter) <br />$ 49.50 <br />$ 45.50 <br />$ (4.00) <br />Sanitary Sewer Base Fee (qtr.) <br />37.35 <br />34.20 <br />(3.15) <br />Total <br />$ 86.85 <br />$ 79.70 <br />$ (7.15) <br />-8% <br />Discussion Issues <br />In evaluating the relevance of any existing public assistance program, it's important to reflect <br />upon why the program was created in the first place and whether those objectives have been met. <br />In this particular case, the Program was created to achieve a specific outcome — to encourage <br />homeowners to connect to the municipal system. Clearly this primary objective was achieved <br />long ago. <br />This raises the question as to what the Program's current objectives are. Intuitively one could <br />surmise that one of the remaining objectives is to provide assistance to those that have limited <br />financial means. However, the Program does not feature any means testing. Recipients merely <br />have to sign an affidavit signifying that they're drawing social security or are at or below federal <br />poverty guidelines. Currently, only a handful of homeowners are receiving the discount because <br />they are below the federal poverty guidelines. <br />This discussion has taken place at the Council level on several occasions in the past decade. <br />Each time, the Council has taken no action. Given the significant financial shift that is <br />occurring, the Council is advised to carefully consider whether the Program's objectives are still <br />relevant. That consideration should be made with the understanding that the number of <br />recipients in the Program is expected to steadily expand over the next 10 years under current <br />eligibility criteria. <br />This expansion will make it financially advantageous for older homeowners, while <br />simultaneously making it financially more difficult for younger ones. <br />