My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-12-03_PR_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2013
>
2013-12-03_PR_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/27/2013 4:20:38 PM
Creation date
11/27/2013 4:20:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
185bridges and boardwalks, as a few examples. The current CIP listing suggests a $51M <br />186investment over the next 20 years. The Renewal Program covers the first 3-4 years of the <br />187current 20 year program, after that it is estimated that the cost would be $1.5M annually to <br />188maintain our current resources and keep things within the expected life cycles. The CIP also <br />189includes about $200,000 annually in pathway maintenanceand an additional fund for vehicle <br />190replacements. Brokke also mentioned that the Golf Course and the Skating Center each have <br />191separate CIP programs. <br />192 <br />193The PIP program takescare of natural resources along with other small park maintenance <br />194projects like aglime for ball fields. Staff are working with the recently acquired asset <br />195management software to better manage resources and track maintenance needs. <br />196Commission Chair Holt inquired into the PIP name –wondering if this is the best <br />197terminology to use seeing how this program deals mainly with maintenance work, <br />198perhaps a new name would help the community better understand the program. <br />199D. Holt asked Brokke to explain the difference of how CIP and PIP programs would <br />200be handled between a park board and the current parks and recreation commission. <br />201A park Board would be more involved in the budget allocations. Itwould be <br />o <br />202expected that board members would better understandthe intricacies of a <br />203budget. A park board would be more responsible for the actual budget <br />204development and recommending levy levels to the Council. <br />205 <br />2014 DRAFT CALENDAR <br />2067. <br />207Commissioners agreed to move forward with the recommended calendar and address <br />208possible conflicts asthey arise. <br />209 <br />STAFF REPORT <br />2108. <br />211Brokke reported; <br />212The Villa Park Watershed project is nearly completed. <br />213The park building time frame is not yet finalized, looks as if most work will <br />o <br />214be done in 2014. <br />215Staff are using a planned approach to SW Roseville, this includes incorporating <br />216Master Plan information as a guide. <br />217Staff will pursue options as they come up and will definitely engage the <br />o <br />218community in the future. <br />219The Roseville Communities for a Lifetime process is continuing,next meeting is <br />220November 16. <br />221OVAL opens Friday, November 8! <br />222Roseville Visitors Association(RVA)OVALuminations will take place on Friday, <br />223November 8 at 6:30pm. Thanks to the RVA for their longtime sponsorship of this <br />224program. <br />225 <br />OTHER <br />2269. <br />227M.Holt announced the upcoming FORParks Holiday Gala will take place on <br />228November 14 at the Skating Center. The evening will feature amazing entertainment, <br />229great food and beverage all mixed into a fun community social. <br />230 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.