2013-10-22_PWETC_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

DeBenedet opined that there was a need to find a way to cover County Road B-2 and other needs strictly for pathways for recreational opportunities and non- motorized transportation, not just commuting, walking, shopping, or bike riding at leisure. Member DeBenedet suggested that the PWETC give that further consideration as it finalized this build-out plan before recommending it to the City Council. Member DeBenedet recognized audience members attending tonight to speak to this issue as well. Chair Vanderwall reviewed the process to-date as charged by the City Council to the PWETC for a an update and review of the City's original Pathway Master Plan first developed in 1975, with several updates over that 38-year period, mostly recently in 2008. For the benefit of the listening audience, Chair Vanderwall noted that the PWETC looked at the Master Plan differently than the Parks & Recreation Commission or other people, since they were the Commission charged with the structure of the community: water, sewer, roadways, and commerce around the City. Chair Vanderwall noted the PWETC's interest in making sure roadways and pathways got people through town easily; and therefore its criteria would appear from a different perspective, whether it seemed fair to a neighborhood or not. From his personal viewpoint, Chair Vanderwall stated that when he looked at pathways, he considered how many people would actually use and it how much traffic would they encounter in doing so. While it may not be the same criteria that the Parks & Recreation Commission might use, Chair Vanderwall reiterated his and the PWETC's concern in how to get bicyclers and pedestrians safely around the community as their numbers continued to increase. Chair Vanderwall noted that individual Commissioners agreed to rank their priorities, and then develop a composite of those individual rankings to compromise on those priorities in reviewing the broader picture, recognizing that individual priorities may not end up ranking as high as preferred by those individual Commissioners, himself included. Member Stenlund provided his rationale for his individual ranking, noting that he made the assumption for those things already being funded, they would be built; and scored priorities accordingly; and not ranking something already being done, since they were already in process. Member Gjerdingen provided his rationale for ranking, including those roads transferred from Ramsey County to the City, and those still pending. As previously notified, and unable to attend tonight's meeting, PWETC Commissioner Joan Felice provided written comments via e-mail dated October 22, 2013, requesting reconsideration of the priority ranking for the southwestern segment of County Road B to Cleveland Avenue segment, based on feedback she'd received since the last PWETC meeting; attached hereto and made apart hereof. Page 11 of 22