CC_Minutes_2013_1125 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,November 25, 2013 Page 17 reviewed the origination of this program, put in place since at least 1970, as de- tailed in the staff report. Since the PWETC meeting, Councilmember Willmus questioned whether Mr. Miller had an opportunity to explore how to phase out the Senior Discount Pro- gram; and how to initiate an income-qualified or means-tested program. Mr. Miller advised, that while more time was needed to fully research it, solely addressing the means-testing, he saw no need to reinvent the wheel, and recom- mended seeking guidance from other aid programs (e.g. State or County), who al- ready had a good base of knowledge and methodology that could guide the City at the local level. Mr. Miller noted that how many homeowners would be affected would depend on the threshold applied by the City Council, whether sliding scales for adjusted gross income and number of people in a household, or whether simp- ly income verification; as well as whether it would be an honor system versus ver- ifiable results. Mr. Miller advised that the administrative burden for staff depend- ed on the City Council's directive; however, given current Roseville de- mographics, he anticipated that there would not be a significant number of single- family homeowners who would qualify. Based on the PWETC discussion he had observed, Councilmember Willmus opined that it would easier to implement a new program and phase out the old program and no longer enroll anyone in the Senior Discount Program until a means-tested program was in place. Councilmember Willmus questioned the via- bility of keeping enrollment open for the program while attempting to phase it out. In response, Mr. Miller cautioned that, as part of such a process, he would want to ensure that a fair amount of education and awareness was done for the public be- fore implementing any changes. Mr. Miller suggested that education could be done over the next 6-12 months. If the City was to decide on phasing out the cur- rent program, Mr. Miller estimated that if those currently receiving the discount were grandfathered in for the rest of their lives, it could realistically take 20-25 years before that last person left the discount program under that scenario; creat- ing a 25-year administrative burden to hold onto. If the City Council considered a 2-5 year phase out of the current program; Mr. Miller suggested they cap enroll- ment sooner rather than later. However, Mr. Miller personally would not suggest doing so by January 1, 2014; but suggested an end date (e.g. January 1, 2015) sooner rather than later to alert people that an end date was coming and allowing sufficient communication, education and awareness. As the only Councilmember who would qualify for the discount program, Coun- cilmember McGehee admitted that she would be embarrassed to do so; and while recognizing that many take advantage of the discount without any actually need, she supported the idea of capping things now. Councilmember McGehee spoke