Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,November 25, 2013 <br /> Page 36 <br /> Central Park Victoria West Shelter Building and Site Plans <br /> No discussion. <br /> Central Park Victoria East Shelter Building and Site Plans <br /> No discussion. <br /> Central Park Dale West Shelter Building and Site Plans <br /> No discussion. <br /> Central Park Lexington Restroom Building and Site Plans <br /> No discussion. <br /> General Discussion <br /> Mr. Schroeder reviewed the organization of the request for proposals (RFP's) into <br /> and series of bid packages, depending on types of construction, similar trade <br /> groups, magnitude of construction, and the overall allotment of $6 million for <br /> buildings, as well as site improvements, and requesting a sequence of years for <br /> build-out to avoid curtailing existing activities in those parks. <br /> Mr. Schroeder further addressed previous responses to City Council comments <br /> and questions from those discussions, addressing many of the features and appli- <br /> cations as alternates to the main bid. <br /> Councilmember McGehee reiterated her disappointment for residents in not being <br /> able to provide more quality versus quantity; further noting that the priorities giv- <br /> en by the community in various surveys was the need for pathways and natural <br /> spaces. Councilmember McGehee opined that in each park, they seemed to be <br /> taken over by impervious versus permeable surfaces, with more plantings that <br /> would require more maintenance, with no maintenance figure provided yet. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that it made more sense to do several projects <br /> early on and do them well to determine if they were going to be used. Coun- <br /> cilmember McGehee further noted that those things she considered reasonable re- <br /> quests, like wi-fl, heating, easier to maintain exterior materials, and other options <br /> were not given serious consideration to those residents completing community <br /> surveys, who instead were faced with a giant expansion of buildings that would <br /> prove difficult to maintain. <br /> Councilmember Willmus opined that Councilmember McGehee was correct with <br /> reference to pathways; and clarified that when reviewing the revitalization plan <br /> for parks, that was a top response for pathways within parks; which would be part <br /> of this renewal effort along with the buildings. <br /> Councilmember Etten clarified some issues related to the buildings themselves. <br /> Councilmember Etten noted that one goal was to have the buildings more open, <br /> and therefore he felt that the locking components were critical to make that hap- <br />