Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,November 25, 2013 <br /> Page 7 <br /> to extensive stormwater mitigation work along that route, Mr. Schwartz advised <br /> that some of the funding for the stormwater mitigation could come from the <br /> City's Stormwater Utility Fund, estimating $10,000 to $15,000; with the City's <br /> existing Street/Stormwater Budget able to absorb the staff time for the project. <br /> Mr. Schwartz displayed a typical cross-section for this type of a separated facility, <br /> recommending the improvement on the south side of the road to avoid driveways, <br /> mailboxes, and power poles, with fewer obstacles on the south side. Mr. <br /> Schwartz recommended paving a new 8.5' pedestrian pathway with a 2' buffer <br /> between the road and that pedestrian facility. <br /> Mr. Schwartz reviewed the map of this area, adjacent to Cleveland Avenue; and <br /> existing curb and turn lanes as the roadway widens; existing 200' sidewalk adja- <br /> cent to curb; recommending widening of the shoulder to Fulham Avenue to Fair- <br /> ways Lane and houses to the west; and the existing 6' striped shoulder, with the <br /> road wider in that location. Mr. Schwartz noted that the existing facility could be <br /> utilized, or a permanent sidewalk constructed in that location, and another short <br /> stretch of widening of the cul-de-sac at Eustis Street. <br /> Mr. Schwartz sought direction for staff from the City Council based on the re- <br /> search completed up to this point. <br /> Council Discussion <br /> Councilmember Willmus thanked Mr. Schwartz for bringing this forward to the <br /> City Council following the October PWEC meeting and public comment, as well <br /> as that Commission's work over the summer months and their process in scoring <br /> and balancing their ranking for the Pathway Master Plan Build-out while balanc- <br /> ing it with feedback from this specific neighborhood. When he had observed this <br /> project sliding lower on that ranking, Councilmember Willmus advised that it had <br /> concerned him. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Willmus, Mr. Schwartz confirmed that recon- <br /> struction of the County Road B was at least 8-10 years out; and any widening of <br /> the roadway would only be an interim solution. At the request of Councilmember <br /> Willmus, Mr. Schwartz further confirmed that a reconstruction project would <br /> eliminate most of this short-term solution, as it would be difficult to match grades <br /> of a future roadway, which he anticipated to be at a lower elevation; although if <br /> the off-road construction was of concrete, there was some potential that a portion <br /> of it could be saved (e.g. Fulham to Fairways and just beyond). <br /> At the request of Councilmember Willmus, Mr. Schwartz advised that he had not <br /> had further discussion with the neighborhood since putting this together, as it had <br /> been intended as an immediate response following the PWETC meeting. Coun- <br /> cilmember Willmus expressed interest in hearing feedback from the neighbors <br /> about widening the road, and whether or not there was widespread support for do- <br />