My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_1202
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_1202
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2013 10:47:49 AM
Creation date
12/16/2013 10:47:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
12/2/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, December 2, 2013 <br /> Page 8 <br /> Mayor Roe noted that the last zero increase years for employee COLA were dur- <br /> ing recession years; and several years had only seen 1% or 2% increases. <br /> Market Rate <br /> Mr. Miller advised that the City compared to peer cities for certain skill sets for <br /> employees in the market place, using the peer group average. While originally <br /> proposing that the City make adjustments at 100% of that average, Mr. Miller <br /> noted that the City Council established a policy to set that at 98% of the peer av- <br /> erage. <br /> Councilmember McGehee clarified that this study had been done by an outside <br /> consultant, and not performed by City staff. <br /> Future Projections for Upcoming Decade <br /> When reviewing the current levels of services and programs, Mr. Miller noted that <br /> the City had made a number of structural changes and addressed its long-term <br /> Capital Improvement Program (CIP) assets. If nothing was to change and there <br /> were no expansions of programs, or no new staff added to improve services to the <br /> public, Mr. Miller opined that he would then expect future increases to mirror in- <br /> flation versus the more substantial increases felt over the last few years in getting <br /> back to a sustainable structural budget. However, Mr. Miller noted that this was <br /> up to future City Councils to make that policy call; with those policies determin- <br /> ing whether budgets would be inflationary or above, or offset by reductions. <br /> As part of the 20-year CIP, Councilmember McGehee noted that ongoing mainte- <br /> nance had not been fully funded in the past, but with the CIP Asset Program in <br /> place, she was anticipating more maintenance monies and maintenance of those <br /> assets than in the past. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that, as part of the philosophy in recent changes made in utility <br /> rates and property tax collections to cover those capital costs, the City had prelim- <br /> inarily projected twenty years into the future if the City took care of what it had. <br /> In that case, Mayor Roe noted that many funding sources would have been at zero <br /> or below; with the current 20-year CIP proposed to sustain the City at a reasona- <br /> ble level above zero. While this effort is not grandiose, Mayor Roe noted that <br /> each annual budget process would include a review and update of the 20-year CIP <br /> to keep on that trajectory. Mayor Roe clarified that new pathway construction <br /> and building replacements had not been included in the CIP, as buildings had his- <br /> torically been paid by borrowing money(e.g. bonding). <br /> Identification of Peer Cities <br /> Mayor Roe suggested that staff respond later and provide the identity of those six- <br /> ty-two peer cities used for levy comparisons in writing and on the City's website. <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.