Laserfiche WebLink
City of Roseville — 2013 Budget <br />Division /Program: Park Improvement Program <br />Organizational Responsibility: Parks &Recreation Director <br />Department Description <br />The Park Improvement Program (PIP) provides for the preservation of parrs, open space, and related <br />recreational areas. The pose of this fund is to renew and reconstruct existing park facilities. The <br />Program's activities are accounted for in the Park Improvement Fund. <br />2013 is and Objectives <br />Continue to conduct analysis of historical and life cycle information as Phase 1 Parrs and <br />Recreation renewal Plan moves forward. <br />Restore future PIP budget to reflect actual needs. <br />Integrate Life Cycle information into Asset Management implementation. <br />Focus on safety and aesthetics as a high priority. <br />Financial Summary <br />FTE's <br />2013 Budget Impact Items <br />Not applicable. <br />2011/2012 Achievements <br />0 Full analysis of PIP historical information and projections for future needs as 2012-2016 Phase 1 <br />Pans and recreation renewal Program moves forward. <br />0 Budget reductions precluded moving forward with project needs in 2012. <br />2009 <br />2010 <br />2011 <br />2012 <br />2013 <br />Increase % Increase <br />Actual <br />Actual <br />Actual <br />Bum <br />- — c <br />Ira Decrease <br />Personal Services <br />$ <br />- <br />$ - <br />- <br />$ - 0.0% <br />Supplies & Materials <br />- <br />- <br />- <br />- <br />- <br />- 0.0% <br />Other Services & Charges <br />_ <br />_ <br />_ <br />_ 0.00 <br />Capital outlay <br />410,086 <br />765,073 <br />137,015 <br />409000 <br />403,000 <br />0.0% <br />Total <br />410,086 <br />$ 769,073 <br />$ 1375,085 <br />$ 40,000 <br />$ 40,000 <br />$ - 0.0% <br />FTE's <br />2013 Budget Impact Items <br />Not applicable. <br />2011/2012 Achievements <br />0 Full analysis of PIP historical information and projections for future needs as 2012-2016 Phase 1 <br />Pans and recreation renewal Program moves forward. <br />0 Budget reductions precluded moving forward with project needs in 2012. <br />