Laserfiche WebLink
Long -term debt. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City of Roseville had total <br />long -term debt outstanding of $12,765,000; of which $1,750,000 was for general <br />obligation improvement debt which has financed special assessment construction as part <br />of the City's paving management program, $8,465,000 for the general obligation <br />municipal building debt which financed the construction of the expansion of City Hall <br />and the Public Works Building, and $2,550,000 to finance the replacement of the Ice <br />Arena refrigeration system. In addition, the City also has long -term debt in the amount of <br />$1,256,553 for compensated absences. <br />City of Roseville's Outstanding Debt <br />General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Certificates of Indebtedness, and <br />Compensated Absences <br />The City of Roseville maintains an Aal rating from Moody's and an AA from Standard <br />and Poor's on all of its general obligation debt. <br />State statutes limit the amount of general obligation debt a Minnesota city may issue to <br />3% of total Estimated Market Value. The current debt limitation for the City of Roseville <br />is $133,654,878. $11,015,000 of the City's outstanding debt is counted against the <br />statutory limitation as the debt is wholly financed by general tax levy. <br />Additional information on the City of Roseville's long -term debt can be found in Note 1- <br />D on page 52 of this report, and Note 4 -G on pages 62 -64. <br />Economic Factors and next year's Budgets and Rates <br />• The City made operational adjustments in recognition of the expected loss of <br />state -aid and declining interest earnings. <br />• Recreation program fees were increased to reflect the rising costs of individual <br />programs. In addition, user charges for proprietary funds were also changed to <br />reflect current and anticipated conditions and asset replacement needs. <br />These factors were considered when the City of Roseville prepared its 2010 budget. <br />ON <br />Governmental <br />Governmental <br />Business- <br />Business - <br />Activities <br />Activities <br />Type <br />Type <br />Total <br />Total <br />2009 <br />2008 <br />2009 <br />2008 <br />2009 <br />2008 <br />General Obligation <br />Improvement bonds <br />$197509000 <br />$291309000 <br />$ - <br />$ - <br />$197509000 <br />$291309000 <br />General Obligation <br />Municipal bonds <br />894659000 <br />798909000 <br />- <br />- <br />894659000 <br />798909000 <br />Certificates of <br />Indebtedness <br />295509000 <br />295509000 <br />- <br />- <br />295509000 <br />295509000 <br />Compensated absences <br />192569553 <br />192029978 <br />- <br />- <br />192569553 <br />192029978 <br />Total <br />1490219553 <br />$1397729978 <br />$ - <br />$ - <br />$1490219553 <br />$1397729978 <br />The City of Roseville maintains an Aal rating from Moody's and an AA from Standard <br />and Poor's on all of its general obligation debt. <br />State statutes limit the amount of general obligation debt a Minnesota city may issue to <br />3% of total Estimated Market Value. The current debt limitation for the City of Roseville <br />is $133,654,878. $11,015,000 of the City's outstanding debt is counted against the <br />statutory limitation as the debt is wholly financed by general tax levy. <br />Additional information on the City of Roseville's long -term debt can be found in Note 1- <br />D on page 52 of this report, and Note 4 -G on pages 62 -64. <br />Economic Factors and next year's Budgets and Rates <br />• The City made operational adjustments in recognition of the expected loss of <br />state -aid and declining interest earnings. <br />• Recreation program fees were increased to reflect the rising costs of individual <br />programs. In addition, user charges for proprietary funds were also changed to <br />reflect current and anticipated conditions and asset replacement needs. <br />These factors were considered when the City of Roseville prepared its 2010 budget. <br />ON <br />