Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, December 9, 2013 <br /> Page 10 <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Laliberte; Etten; McGehee; and Roe. <br /> Nays: Willmus. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> 14. Business Items—Presentations/Discussions <br /> a. Merit Pay Policy Discussion <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, Interim City Manager Trudgeon reviewed this re- <br /> quest as detailed in the Request for Council Action (RCA) dated December 9, <br /> 2013. As noted in the RCA dated December 9, 2013, and specific to Item 12.a <br /> entitled, "Consider Adopting a Final 2014 Tax Levy and Budget," Mr. Trudgeon <br /> noted that the proposed funding including a temporary suspension of$30,000 for <br /> the current merit pay system, and proposed to be funded from General Fund con- <br /> tingency funds for 2014. Mr. Trudgeon noted that this is usually a one-time bo- <br /> nus, and determined by Department Heads on a case-by-case basis. <br /> While this award policy is part of the employee compensation mix, Mr. Trudgeon <br /> advised that it should be a standalone program and was more of an organizational <br /> issue for Department Heads to recognize continued excellence of its star employ- <br /> ees. While the overall amount of dollars is small, Mr. Trudgeon recommended <br /> continuation of the program for the health of the organization in recognizing those <br /> who go the extra mile and perform beyond their regular job duties, as well as <br /> those who make services better and find more efficient, less costly ways to pro- <br /> vide services or programs. Regardless of what the City Council decided for the <br /> rest of the 2014 employee wage/benefit package, Mr. Trudgeon respectfully re- <br /> quested that they continue to fund this award program in 2014. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon noted that, as indicated in the RCA, he had sought input from De- <br /> partment Heads, with their cumulative suggestion to call this program a "Merit <br /> Award Program" versus a"Merit Pay Program," with those discussions indicating <br /> that they felt it was important to keep the program organizationally, but look at <br /> performance measures in granting those awards, as indicated in the RCA. Mr. <br /> Trudgeon gave credit to Finance Director Miller and his staff team for putting to- <br /> gether the majority of the proposed program, specifically the "Merit Award Plan <br /> Performance Standards," as outlined in lines 38-56 of the RCA (page 2). Mr. <br /> Trudgeon specifically highlighted lines 55 — 56 of the caution for Departments in <br /> refraining from setting employee work goals for the sole purpose of establishing <br /> eligibility for Merit Pay. Mr. Trudgeon noted that the use of the Award Program <br /> should be used judiciously and to provide for and encourage such stellar perfor- <br /> mance for the benefit of the whole organization and taxpayers/citizens. <br /> From the context of the budget, Mr. Trudgeon recommended continued funding <br /> of the merit pay award program as indicated at a cost of$35,000, as already iden- <br /> tified as part of the 2014 budget. If the City Council preferred further discussion <br /> for continuing the program or its make-up beyond 2014, Mr. Trudgeon asked that <br />