My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_1209
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_1209
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2014 1:23:56 PM
Creation date
1/13/2014 1:23:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
12/9/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, December 9, 2013 <br /> Page 20 <br /> Councilmember McGehee admitted that she was not a big fan of using reserves; <br /> however, on the other hand, she was also not a big fan of being understaffed, <br /> opining that this had been the case. Having done her own research on personnel <br /> costs and operating budgets of other communities, Councilmember McGehee not- <br /> ed that she found other communities well above the City of Roseville's General <br /> Fund personnel costs. Councilmember McGehee opined that she found other cit- <br /> ies at 75%, with St. Louis Park as an example at 76.2% of their General Fund; and <br /> further referenced news articles in the weekend paper related to taxes in general <br /> and Roseville specifically. <br /> Mayor Roe clarified that total expenditures for 2014 from tax-supported funds <br /> were $23 million, of which $12.6 million was for personnel costs, or roughly <br /> 54%. <br /> Councilmember Etten noted those percentages quoted in weekend news articles <br /> also depended on which School District was represented in Roseville, with two <br /> (2) districts incorporated in the city. <br /> Councilmember McGehee provided her calculations for both School Districts 623 <br /> and 621; and expressed her difficulty in reconciling the fact that, unlike many <br /> communities, the City's personnel costs were not very high based on the popula- <br /> tion and size of the City, especially when comparing it to the Cities of Edina or St. <br /> Louis Park and their employee counts based on their square footage and popula- <br /> tion. Councilmember McGehee opined that the City of Roseville had more <br /> things, more equipment and more buildings in its asset inventory than it did peo- <br /> ple; and expressed one of her concerns going forward is not adding personnel to <br /> address ongoing maintenance or a plan for those things being added (e.g. fire sta- <br /> tion or park renewal program buildings). Councilmember McGehee noted that, in <br /> spite of asking for that information several years ago, she had yet to receive it; <br /> and opined that a bigger policy discussion was needed whether to take money <br /> from reserves now or look at the bigger Roseville picture and address the values <br /> of citizens and what they wanted to pay for. <br /> Councilmember Willmus clarified with staff that the License Center was not an <br /> Enterprise Fund, and therefore the comparisons being made by Councilmember <br /> McGehee were not an "apples to apples" comparison, since the City of Roseville <br /> had twenty-two (22) different funds. Councilmember Willmus opined that this <br /> did not provide for a fair comparison when the City and its citizens were looking <br /> to find a way to offset the levy somewhat in areas that were available, his main <br /> focus tonight through this discussion. If the City of Roseville was going to be <br /> compared to other cities on a fund level, Councilmember Willmus opined that <br /> there was a need to know what those funds were. <br /> Councilmember McGehee recognized that aspect of comparison. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.