My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-11-07_PR_Comm Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Minutes
>
2013
>
2013-11-07_PR_Comm Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2014 2:07:19 PM
Creation date
1/15/2014 2:07:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />bridges and boardwalks, as a few examples. The current CIP listing suggests a $51M <br />investment over the next 20 years. The Renewal Program covers the first 3-4 years of the <br />current 20 year program, after that it is estimated that the cost would be $1.5M annually to <br />maintain our current resources and keep things within the expected life cycles. The CIP also <br />includes about $200,000 annually in pathway maintenance and an additional fund for vehicle <br />replacements. Brokke also mentioned that the Golf Course and the Skating Center each have <br />separate CIP programs. <br /> <br />The PIP program takes care of natural resources along with other small park maintenance <br />projects like aglime for ball fields. Staff are working with the recently acquired asset <br /> <br />management software to better manage resources and track maintenance needs. <br /> <br /> <br />Commission Chair Holt inquired into the PIP name – wondering if this is the best <br />terminology to use seeing how this program deals mainly with maintenance work, <br />perhaps a new name would help the community better understand the program. <br /> <br /> <br />D. Holt asked Brokke to explain the difference of how CIP and PIP programs would <br />be handled between a park board and the current parks and recreation commission. <br /> <br />A park Board would be more involved in the budget allocations. It would be <br />o <br />expected that board members would better understand the intricacies of a <br />budget. A park board would be more responsible for the actual budget <br />development and recommending levy levels to the Council. <br /> <br />7.2014 DRAFT CALENDAR <br /> <br />Commissioners agreed to move forward with the recommended calendar and address <br />possible conflicts as they arise. <br /> <br />8. STAFF REPORT <br /> <br />Brokke reported; <br /> <br /> <br />The Villa Park Watershed project is nearly completed. <br /> <br />The park building time frame is not yet finalized, looks as if most work will <br />o <br />be done in 2014. <br /> <br /> <br />Staff are using a planned approach to SW Roseville, this includes incorporating <br />Master Plan information as a guide. <br /> <br />Staff will pursue options as they come up and will definitely engage the <br />o <br />community in the future. <br /> <br /> <br />The Roseville Communities for a Lifetime process is continuing, next meeting is <br />November 16. <br /> <br /> <br />OVAL opens Friday, November 8! <br /> <br /> <br />Roseville Visitors Association (RVA) OVALuminations will take place on Friday, <br />November 8 at 6:30pm. Thanks to the RVA for their longtime sponsorship of this <br />program. <br /> <br />9. OTHER <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />M. Holt announced the upcoming FORParks Holiday Gala will take place on <br />November 14 at the Skating Center. The evening will feature amazing entertainment, <br /> <br />great food and beverage all mixed into a fun community social. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.