My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_0106
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_0106
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2014 3:16:40 PM
Creation date
1/28/2014 3:16:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/6/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, January 06, 2014 <br /> Page 15 <br /> Laliberte moved, Willmus seconded, that the HRA appointment remain as is, re- <br /> maining a City Council member appointment by the Mayor and ratification by the <br /> City Council. <br /> Based on the interest expressed by three members of the City Council in serving <br /> in that capacity, Mayor Roe opined that this seemed a reasonable motion to make. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that the City Council already had sufficient say <br /> on what occurred with the HRA; and questioned the difference one vote made and <br /> whether an elected official served on the HRA or a member of the public. When <br /> the HRA had a major decision to make on their levy and taxing, Councilmember <br /> McGehee noted that they came to the City Council for advice anyway, creating <br /> considerable influence related to policy and decision-making. Given the predom- <br /> inantly citizen make-up of the HRA, Councilmember McGehee opined that they <br /> do an excellent job; and she could see no reason not to appoint a member of the <br /> public to the HRA. <br /> Councilmember Willmus again clarified that the only action the City Council had <br /> was approval of the levy amount, but that the HRA budget and individual budget <br /> line items were at the HRA's discretion. Under those circumstances, Coun- <br /> cilmember Willmus understood the rationale in having a City Council elected of- <br /> ficial in that role as a member of the HRA. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Etten, Councilmember Willmus responded that <br /> he did not feel he had any extra influence in HRA decisions due to his dual role as <br /> a Councilmember. Therefore, Councilmember Etten questioned how much <br /> weight the elected official versus private citizen has; and how much additional in- <br /> fluence or control would that person carry on behalf of Roseville citizens. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte clarified that her point was not to imply that their vote <br /> had any more weight; but noted that when this taxing authority was established as <br /> an independent group, it was decided to include a Councilmember as one of those <br /> members; clarifying that their vote was not worth more than any other member, <br /> but questioned why the City Council would want to shirk that responsibility al- <br /> ready established. <br /> Councilmember McGehee clarified her position, opining that it would not be <br /> shirking responsibility, but simply allowing citizens another seat at the table as a <br /> vital part of local government. If the City Council member on the HRA is nothing <br /> more than another citizen voice, a private citizen should be able to fill that role <br /> just as well. <br /> From an historical context, Mayor Roe noted that the HRA was originally estab- <br /> lished with all seven seats made up of citizen members. However, after 2-3 years <br /> of its operation and under the jurisdiction of former Mayor Klausing, when a va- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.