Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,January 06, 2014 <br /> Page 25 <br /> not preclude partnering and developing a synergy among other advisory com- <br /> mission's and a Community Engagement advisory commission. Mayor Roe <br /> opined that civic engagement in itself indicated citizen ownership and endorse- <br /> ment of the process, providing a group of stewards of the community visioning <br /> process. Mayor Roe noted that the community visioning process would need up- <br /> dated in the near future; and suggested charging that group with that process, with <br /> part of their charge being to ensure responsible stewards of the vision and lan- <br /> guage of the vision and process moving forward. <br /> HRC <br /> Regarding the HRC retaining the civic engagement focus, Mayor Roe opined that <br /> to give them both goals would be too much. <br /> Councilmembers Willmus and Etten spoke in support of a separate Community <br /> Engagement advisory commission and HRC. <br /> Public Comment <br /> Gary Grefenberg, 91 Mid Oaks Lane <br /> As Co-Chair of the current Civic Engagement Task Force as a subcommittee un- <br /> der the HRC, and after eighteen months of trying to do both, Mr. Grefenberg <br /> opined that it was impossible; and stated that he refused to do both. Mr. Grefen- <br /> berg referenced the little support received by the task force from staff at this time <br /> and the challenges that created; and recommended that the Administration De- <br /> partment make staff available to take minutes and offer other support to the group. <br /> Mr. Grefenberg further opined that the Civic Engagement Task Force worked on <br /> most things primarily outside the HRC, and he saw no value in continued report- <br /> ing to the HRC before directly to the City Council. Mr. Grefenberg further <br /> opined that staffing civic engagement in a department and with designated staff <br /> was critically necessary to provide it with status, and a clear charge with the abil- <br /> ity to respond to the City Council as a separate advisory commission. Mr. Gre- <br /> fenberg referenced some of the issues that the HRC needed to address, and as- <br /> sured Councilmembers that they would have sufficient work to do without the <br /> civic engagement aspect. <br /> Mr. Grefenberg expressed his appreciation with the current collaboration he was <br /> seeing between the HRC, Civic Engagement Task Force and staff; and suggested <br /> civic engagement assist communications, but not be left up to communications <br /> staff alone. Mr. Grefenberg stated that the City was now at a new beginning with <br /> a new Communications Director in place, and expressed his appreciation at being <br /> asked by the Director for his suggestions; opining that this was the type of rela- <br /> tionship needed. For the success of the website, Mr. Grefenberg opined that it <br /> would be important to have the Civic Engagement advisory commission in place <br /> soon to work with staff. <br /> Mr. Grefenberg noted that one thing lost in the process, when the HRC agreed <br /> with the recommendation of the Civic Engagement Task Force as a separate <br />