My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-11-26_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
2013-11-26_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2014 9:38:08 AM
Creation date
1/29/2014 9:37:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/26/2013
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the meeting was to approve a motion to incorporate a question specific to that <br /> issue as part of a citizen survey to be conducted in early 2014. Mr. Schwartz <br /> advised that the City Council had also expressed interest in receiving the results <br /> of the U of MN-Mankato State Road Impact Software; as well as a desire to <br /> gauge community interest through the survey. <br /> Member DeBenedet suggested the need to inform and educate citizens on what <br /> organized collection entailed before they were randomly sampled. Member <br /> DeBenedet noted that at least one Councilmember was convinced that the <br /> consortium model would not result in savings; however, since that information <br /> was currently unknown, Member DeBenedet suggested that would also be useful <br /> information to know and share with the public. <br /> Mr. Schwartz questioned how best to obtain that information to get a comparison <br /> of existing organized collection cities with multiple haulers. Mr. Schwartz noted, <br /> with the new law, the number remained unknown in Roseville until haulers came <br /> in with their numbers as part of the 60-day process. <br /> Member DeBenedet suggested that the City go through that process for a <br /> consortium and then survey residents whether to proceed or not. <br /> Chair Vanderwall concurred with Member DeBenedet's suggestion, opining that <br /> it would at least get things moving; rather than stopping the process yet again, <br /> with the law requiring public input. Chair Vanderwall opined that if it couldn't <br /> get started, it couldn't get finished; and a decision needed to be made. <br /> 5. Pathway Master Plan Build Out <br /> Mr. Schwartz noted that the PWETC had run out of time at the October PWETC <br /> meeting due to considerable public comment, and offered the same spreadsheet <br /> from that meeting to continue those deliberations and rankings. <br /> Recognizing audience members, Chair Vanderwall opened the floor for public <br /> comment before member discussion. <br /> Public Comment <br /> Gary Grefenberg, 91 Mid Oaks Lane <br /> Mr. Grefenberg advised that he was present tonight as a representative of the <br /> Southwest Area Roseville Neighborhoods (SWARN), a neighborhood association <br /> including neighborhoods immediately adjoining County Road B. As indicated in <br /> previous PWETC meeting minutes, Mr. Grefenberg note that a representative of <br /> SWARN had been requested to attend tonight's meeting. While not all residents <br /> are members of SWARN, Mr. Grefenberg advised that it represented 60-70 <br /> families who were. Mr. Grefenberg referenced the fairly lengthy discussion held <br /> at the November 25, 2013 City Council meeting, which he anticipated Mr. <br /> Schwartz would report on tonight. Mr. Grefenberg stated that it was his <br /> understanding that the PWETC would be finalizing their rankings tonight; <br /> Page 4 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.