Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,January 27, 2014 <br /> Page 15 <br /> Council for their review prior to the February 10th meeting, and scheduled for fi- <br /> nal approval at the February 10, 2014 City Council meeting. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Laliberte regarding the extent of those revi- <br /> sions, Councilmember McGehee clarified that she intended that her motion in- <br /> clude ALL revisions discussed. <br /> Mayor Roe advised that such an all-encompassing intent may change his support <br /> of the motion, given the amount of staff time required to accomplish that request, <br /> especially with commissions that already exist. Mayor Roe opined that it would <br /> be prudent to review them as time allows; however, he expressed concern in ask- <br /> ing staff to do so now to make them all consistent. <br /> Friendly Amendment <br /> Mayor Roe offered a friendly amendment that only the two new commissions be <br /> revised at this time; with the others reviewed after the adoption of the 2 new ordi- <br /> nances. <br /> The makers of the motion accepted this friendly amendment. <br /> Roll Call (as amended) <br /> Ayes: McGehee; Willmus; Laliberte; Etten; and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> Finance Commission <br /> City Manager Trudgeon asked that the City Council think about their intent and <br /> have an ensuing discussion at a future meeting regarding whether the Finance <br /> Commission was to review all Department Head budgets and make recommenda- <br /> tions to the City Council, or to be involved in the steps and review those budgets <br /> for clarity and transparency as the City Council considered them. In other words, <br /> whether the City Council's intent was to have the commission at the table with <br /> Department Heads at the staff level before information was brought to the City <br /> Council. <br /> Councilmember Willmus suggested that, as the commission was established, that <br /> should be one of their first discussion points, with some of the process being self- <br /> guiding. Councilmember Willmus opined that he would be comfortable if they <br /> wanted to get into each department in-depth; and suggested further discussion on <br /> February 10th included the best time for this group to meet, opining that it may be <br /> better suited to meeting earlier in the day or after work; but also to make sure <br /> those meeting times remained cognizant of staff and Department Head time and <br /> schedules. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte opined that staff should not be required to duplicate <br /> their efforts for the advisory commission and the City Council; but her intent was <br />