Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,January 27, 2014 <br /> Page 21 <br /> such as they had done in the City of Bloomington, with those management em- <br /> ployees still being paid but traveling elsewhere to their other locations in order for <br /> the firm to retain them. As stated by Mr. Jacobson, Mr. Thon stated that he found <br /> no reason to grant a stay, which would hurt their firm significantly. If the City <br /> Council was to grant a stay, Mr. Thon opined that a bond should be required to <br /> make their firm whole if the court concurs that the City Council had made the <br /> right decision in the first place. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Mr. Tron confirmed that the man- <br /> agement employees hired in Bloomington had been provided an opportunity to <br /> work at their facilities elsewhere. Mr. Tron noted that merchandisers and cash- <br /> iers, their lowest paid employees, had to be laid off, but all management and ser- <br /> vice people were now working elsewhere in other states. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Mr. Tron responded that merchan- <br /> disers and cashiers were typically paid in the range of$10 to 13, with overtime of- <br /> fered if interested; and store managers typically made about $60,000 to $90,000. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Laliberte, Mr. Tron advised that the intent had <br /> been to open in middle or late march of 2014, with the store currently under con- <br /> struction. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Mr. Tron clarified that the landlord <br /> was doing the remodeling, with the license holder responsible for the costs of the <br /> F/F/E (fixtures, furniture and equipment) of approximately $1.1 million, with in- <br /> ventory purchases anticipated at approximately $2 million. While the landlord <br /> could speak for themselves, Mr. Tron estimated that they would be investing be- <br /> tween $1 million and $1.5 million in the build-out of the facility. <br /> Ms. Erin Mathern, Attorney with Larkin Hoffman, representing the land- <br /> lord, Tanner Development at Rosedale Marketplace <br /> As tenants go, from a landlord's perspective, Ms. Mathern opined that Total Wine <br /> & Spirits was a good anchor tenant for Rosedale Marketplace to bring traffic to <br /> the shopping mall as well as into Roseville generally. Ms. Mathern confirmed <br /> that her client had agreed to expend $1.5 million in landlord improvements to the <br /> leased space, as part of the 158-page lease agreement between the parties. Ms. <br /> Mathern noted that a good portion of the lease was related to tenant improve- <br /> ments, and what the landlord intended to do so the tenant could operate in that <br /> space. Based on the actual changes being made to the building, and potential <br /> economic injury to the landlord if a stay was granted, Ms. Mathern advised that <br /> the landlord was definitely opposed. <br /> No matter the decision of the City Council regarding the stay, Ms. Mathern ad- <br /> vised that the landlord would need to continue with the construction in order to <br />