Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,January 27,2014 <br /> Page 28 <br /> tenant building, or they remained unaware of it and it ends up on the tax statement <br /> at yearend. <br /> Mr. Rancone addressed the crux of the e-mail and their firm not finding out about <br /> these delinquent fees from 2009, until they received their first notice from the <br /> City in December of 2013. Mr. Rancone reviewed the history of the situation, <br /> their LLC's purchase of the property from UV Color, since bankrupt, and opined <br /> that staff could have found out who the property owner was before now. Mr. <br /> Rancone clarified that the majority of the billing, $9,393, represented on quarter's <br /> billing, with the former tenant being current with their previous billings until July <br /> of 2009. Mr. Rancone advised that, had they been aware of this delinquent bill, <br /> they could have incorporated them into the lease negotiations and assets of UV <br /> Color eventually taken over by Roseville Properties' LLC. However, since they <br /> were just noticed of them in December of 2013 that was no longer possible. Mr. <br /> Rancone advised that their meters go directly to their tenants as a matter of policy <br /> to avoid getting in the middle of situations. <br /> Mr. Rancone opined that better communication was needed between property <br /> owners and municipalities; and questioned whether the City Code was properly <br /> utilized, since there was no 90-day notification given, and notice was finally pro- <br /> vided after an agreement had already been negotiated with a new tenant. Mr. <br /> Rancone further opined that the City needed to take responsibility in this situation <br /> as well as the property owner, and sought a common-sense solution between the <br /> two parties for a fair resolution. <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, City Attorney Gaughan reviewed state statute ena- <br /> bling local municipalities to impose just and fair charges, with state statute not in- <br /> cluding the term "shall," while City Code does include that provision. Mayor Roe <br /> questioned if that provision was consistent with other City Code provisions as <br /> well. <br /> Councilmember Etten questioned if it was possible for staff to identify or clarify <br /> those 100 or so commercial properties through form letter or e-mail to clear up <br /> any future issues and clean up the system expeditiously. <br /> Finance Director Miller responded that the effort could be made; however, he <br /> opined that the bigger challenge would be to maintain an accurate database, since <br /> when a property changed hands, the data would no longer be accurate unless there <br /> was a "but for" process in place to keep current. In this case, Mr. Miller ques- <br /> tioned if it would have been of value anyway, given this unique bankruptcy situa- <br /> tion, unless it had been possible when Roseville Properties had been marketing <br /> the property. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Etten, Finance Director Miller advised that staff <br /> could attempt to update the data on a quarterly billing basis provided enough re- <br />