My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-01-28_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
2014-01-28_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2014 8:42:24 AM
Creation date
2/27/2014 8:42:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/28/2014
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
there are indications of whether a more than normal number of pavements at a <br /> certain age have deteriorating pavements, observed by surface distresses. Mr. <br /> Schwartz noted that this is not an exclusive City of Roseville issue, but under <br /> discussion by the industry metro-wide. Mr. Schwartz clarified that surface <br /> raveling had little effect on overall pavement ratings under the current <br /> methodology, but with further examination and study being performed by <br /> transportation and engineering staff at the state, county and local levels to <br /> determine if this is a materials or construction issue. <br /> Member DeBenedet asked staff, for the next discussion of the PMP, they provide <br /> a plot map showing marginal streets (in the 50-35 range), then adding poor(below <br /> 50) and other streets with surface distress to provide a more accurate picture of <br /> what the City was facing over the next 5 years to 10 years. <br /> Mr. Schwartz noted that the program indicated an overall rating of just over 80, <br /> but staff considered it to be lower, with the City's overall goal currently to <br /> maintain the street network at a level of 75 or higher. <br /> Current Funding <br /> • Infrastructure Fund = $13 million plus <br /> • Minnesota State Aid (MSA) Streets = $900,000 for 2014 construction <br /> allotment <br /> • Street maintenance annual budget <br /> Mr. Schwartz reported that, according to Finance Director Chris Miller, the <br /> current investment on the PMP is around a 3% annual return; with original <br /> assumptions for a return of 5-6% annual return; creating some funding challenges <br /> for the PMP. <br /> Budget Scenarios Used by the City Council's CIP Subcommittee in Developing <br /> the 20-year CID <br /> Mr. Schwartz reviewed various funding scenarios for the pavement program <br /> showing the backlog of CIP needs. Mr. Schwartz noted, displaying a graph <br /> showing current funding, that the Subcommittee found that the City would need <br /> to increase the PMP funding and spending to keep the PMP ratings at an <br /> acceptable number by increasing the PMP funding by approximately $1 million <br /> annually. Mr. Schwartz noted that there would be $300,000 and $400,000 of tax <br /> levy available as existing street bonds were paid off in 2014 and 2015. <br /> Mr. Schwartz displayed several different budget scenarios for the years between <br /> 2014 and 2033, using current average PCI; and the subsequent total backlog <br /> created for the PMP for those specific years based on the current maintenance <br /> program, totaling $90 million. <br /> At the request of Member Felice, Mr. Schwartz responded that the deterioration <br /> and condition index was not directly related to traffic only. Mr. Schwartz advised <br /> Page 5 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.