Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
167 <br />168 D. Holt reiterated that the charge of the commission is to research the topic and provide <br />169 information to the City Council so they can make a decision. <br />170 <br />171 Responding to D. Holt, staff indicated that because of the importance Roseville Residents place <br />172 on their Parks and Recreation system, that at some point, the consideration of a Park Board may <br />173 be advantageous for Roseville. As guided by the recently updated Master Plan it is suggested <br />174 that Roseville consider a Park District, which is not currently allowed by State Law. A Park <br />175 Board seems like it could be a logical step or progression for Roseville. <br />176 <br />177 The Commission thanked Wall and Simbeck for their work. More discussion will occur at the <br />178 May meeting. <br />179 <br />180 Conclusion <br />181 <br />182 Based on the information gathered by the designated Commission members on the topic and <br />183 discussion at last month's meeting, the demonstrated importance and value placed on parks and <br />184 recreation by Roseville residents, and the guidance in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, the <br />185 Parks and Recreation Commission feels the Park Board structure has merit and should be <br />186 furthered evaluated by the City Council to ensure the parks and recreation system is managed in <br />187 the best interest of the City's residents. <br />